Utility of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Clinical and Research Applications

References

1. • Pardue M.L.
   • Gall J.G.
   Molecular hybridization of radioactive DNA to the DNA of cytological preparations.
   Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969; 64: 600-604
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
2. • Manning J.E.
   • Hershey N.D.
   • Broker T.R.
   • et al.
   A new method of in situ hybridization.
   Chromosoma. 1975; 53: 107-117
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Bi W.
   • Borgan C.
   • Pursley A.N.
   • et al.
   Comparison of chromosome analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis: what is the value of chromosome analysis in today’s genomic array era?.
   Genet Med. 2013; 15: 450-457
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Swerdlow S.
   • Campo E.
   • Harris N.
   • et al.
   4th edition. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. vol. 2. WHO Press, Lyon (France)2017
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Gozzetti A.
   • Le Beau M.M.
   Fluorescence in situ hybridization: uses and limitations.
   Semin Hematol. 2000; 37: 320-333
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • Khan W.A.
   • Rogan P.K.
   • Knoll J.H.
   Localized, non-random differences in chromatin accessibility between homologous metaphase chromosomes.
   Mol Cytogenet. 2014; 7: 70
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Yusuf M.
   • Kaneyoshi K.
   • Fukui K.
   • et al.
   Use of 3D imaging for providing insights into high-order structure of mitotic chromosomes.
   Chromosoma. 2019; 128: 7-13https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-018-0678-5
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
8. • Chen T.R.
   Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): detection of biotin- and digoxigenin-labeled signals on chromosomes.
   J Tissue Cult Methods. 1994; 16: 39-47
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Telenius H.
   • Pelmear A.H.
   • Tunnacliffe A.
   • et al.
   Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes.
   Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1992; 4: 257-263
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Wiegant J.C.
    • van Gijlswijk R.P.
    • Heetebrij R.J.
    • et al.
    ULS: a versatile method of labeling nucleic acids for FISH based on a monofunctional reaction of cisplatin derivatives with guanine moieties.
    Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1999; 87: 47-52
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • Knoll J.H.M.
    Human metaphase chromosome FISH using quantum dot conjugates.
    Methods Mol Biol. 2007; 374: 55-66
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • Müller S.
    • Cremer M.
    • Neusser M.
    • et al.
    A technical note on quantum dots for multi-color fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Cytogenet Genome Res. 2009; 124: 351-359
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • Netten H.
    • Young I.T.
    • van Vliet L.J.
    • et al.
    FISH and chips: automation of fluorescent dot counting in interphase cell nuclei.
    Cytometry. 1997; 28: 1-10
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
14. • Vrolijk H.
    • Sloos W.C.
    • van de Rijke F.M.
    • et al.
    Automation of spot counting in interphase cytogenetics using brightfield microscopy.
    Cytometry. 1996; 24: 158-166
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. • Lerner B.
    • Clocksin W.F.
    • Dhanjal S.
    • et al.
    Automatic signal classification in fluorescence in situ hybridization images.
    Cytometry. 2001; 43: 87-93
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Malpica N.
    • de Solórzano C.O.
    • Vaquero J.J.
    • et al.
    Applying watershed algorithms to the segmentation of clustered nuclei.
    Cytometry. 1997; 28: 289-297
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • Kozubek M.
    • Kozubek S.
    • Lukásová E.
    • et al.
    High-resolution cytometry of FISH dots in interphase cell nuclei.
    Cytometry. 1999; 36: 279-293
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • van der Logt E.M.J.
    • Kuperus D.A.J.
    • van Setten J.W.
    • et al.
    Fully automated fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) staining and digital analysis of HER2 in breast cancer: a validation study.
    PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0123201
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • Kajtár B.
    • Méhes G.
    • Lörch T.
    • et al.
    Automated fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of t(9;22)(q34;q11) in interphase nuclei.
    Cytometry A. 2006; 69: 506-514
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. Abbott Molecular Inc. UroVysion: Bladder Cancer Kit.
    (Available at:)
    https://www.molecular.abbott/us/en/products/oncology/urovysion-bladder-cancer-kit
    (Accessed March 14, 2020)
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • Mascarello J.T.
    • Hirsch B.
    • Kearney H.M.
    • et al.
    Section E9 of the American College of Medical Genetics technical standards and guidelines: fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Genet Med. 2011; 13: 667-675
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • Mascarello J.T.
    • Hirsch B.
    • Kearney H.M.
    • et al.
    ADDENDUM: section E9 of the American College of Medical Genetics Technical Standards and Guidelines: fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Genet Med. 2019; 21: 2405
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. MM07A2: FISH Methods for Clinical Laboratories - CLSI. Clinical & Laboratory Standards institute.
    (Available at:)
    https://clsi.org/standards/products/molecular-diagnostics/documents/mm07/
    (Accessed January 6, 2020)
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Yoshimoto M.
    • Ludkovski O.
    • Good J.
    • et al.
    Use of multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect deletions in clinical tissue sections.
    Lab Invest. 2018; 98: 403-413
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
25. • Gu J.
    • Smith J.L.
    • Dowling P.K.
    Fluorescence in situ hybridization probe validation for clinical use.
    Methods Mol Biol. 2017; 1541: 101-118
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
26. • Saxe D.F.
    • Persons D.L.
    • Wolff D.J.
    • et al.
    Cytogenetics Resource Committee of the College of American Pathologists. Validation of fluorescence in situ hybridization using an analyte-specific reagent for detection of abnormalities involving the mixed lineage leukemia gene.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012; 136: 47-52
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
27. • Sabattini E.
    • Bacci F.
    • Sagramoso C.
    • et al.
    WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues in 2008: an overview.
    Pathologica. 2010; 102: 83-87
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
28. • Maier J.
    • Lange T.
    • Cross M.
    • et al.
    Optimized digital droplet PCR for BCR-ABL.
    J Mol Diagn. 2019; 21: 27-37
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
29. • Wolff D.J.
    • Bagg A.
    • Cooley L.D.
    • et al.
    Guidance for fluorescence in situ hybridization testing in hematologic disorders.
    J Mol Diagn. 2007; 9: 134-143
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
30. • Bueso-Ramos C.E.
    • Kanagal-Shamanna R.
    • Routbort M.J.
    • et al.
    Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms.
    Am J Clin Pathol. 2015; 144: 207-218
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
31. • Nowell P.C.
    The minute chromosome (Phl) in chronic granulocytic leukemia.
    Blut. 1962; 8: 65-66
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
32. • Rowley J.D.
    Letter: a new consistent chromosomal abnormality in chronic myelogenous leukaemia identified by quinacrine fluorescence and Giemsa staining.
    Nature. 1973; 243: 290-293
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
33. • Castagnetti F.
    • Testoni N.
    • Luatti S.
    • et al.
    Deletions of the derivative chromosome 9 do not influence the response and the outcome of chronic myeloid leukemia in early chronic phase treated with imatinib mesylate: GIMEMA CML Working Party analysis.
    J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 2748-2754
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
34. • Luatti S.
    • Baldazzi C.
    • Marzocchi G.
    • et al.
    Cryptic BCR-ABL fusion gene as variant rearrangement in chronic myeloid leukemia: molecular cytogenetic characterization and influence on TKIs therapy.
    Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 29906-29913
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
35. • Hilal T.
    • Fauble V.
    • Ketterling R.P.
    • et al.
    Myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia associated with isolated extramedullary FIP1L1/PDGFRA rearrangement.
    Cancer Genet. 2018; 220: 13-18
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
36. Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: a report from International Myeloma Working Group. - PubMed - NCBI.
    (Available at:)
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=26240224
    (Accessed February 4, 2020)
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
37. • Hu Y.
    • Chen W.
    • Wang J.
    Progress in the identification of gene mutations involved in multiple myeloma.
    Oncotargets Ther. 2019; 12: 4075-4080
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
38. • Tan D.
    • Lee J.H.
    • Chen W.
    • et al.
    Recent advances in the management of multiple myeloma: clinical impact based on resource-stratification. Consensus statement of the Asian Myeloma Network at the 16th International Myeloma Workshop.
    Leuk Lymphoma. 2018; 59: 2305-2317
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
39. • Avet-Loiseau H.
    • Brigaudeau C.
    • Morineau N.
    • et al.
    High incidence of cryptic translocations involving the Ig heavy chain gene in multiple myeloma, as shown by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1999; 24: 9-15
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
40. • Swerdlow S.H.
    • Campo E.
    • Pileri S.A.
    • et al.
    The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms.
    Blood. 2016; 127: 2375-2390
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
41. • Roos-Weil D.
    • Nguyen-Khac F.
    • Chevret S.
    • et al.
    Mutational and cytogenetic analyses of 188 CLL patients with trisomy 12: a retrospective study from the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO) working group.
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2018; 57: 533-540
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
42. • Chastain E.C.
    • Duncavage E.J.
    Clinical prognostic biomarkers in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015; 139: 602-607
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
43. • Berry N.K.
    • Scott R.J.
    • Rowlings P.
    • et al.
    Clinical use of SNP-microarrays for the detection of genome-wide changes in haematological malignancies.
    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019; 142: 58-67
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
44. • Sutton R.
    • Venn N.C.
    • Law T.
    • et al.
    A risk score including microdeletions improves relapse prediction for standard and medium risk precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children.
    Br J Haematol. 2018; 180: 550-562
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
45. • Baughn L.B.
    • Biegel J.A.
    • South S.T.
    • et al.
    Integration of cytogenomic data for furthering the characterization of pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a multi-institution, multi-platform microarray study.
    Cancer Genet. 2015; 208: 1-18
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
46. • da Silva F.B.
    • Machado-Neto J.A.
    • Bertini V.H.L.L.
    • et al.
    Single-nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-A) improves the identification of chromosomal abnormalities by metaphase cytogenetics in myelodysplastic syndrome.
    J Clin Pathol. 2017; 70: 435-442
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
47. • Zhong Y.
    • Beimnet K.
    • Alli Z.
    • et al.
    Multiplexed digital detection of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia fusion transcripts using the nanoString nCounter System.
    J Mol Diagn. 2020; 22: 72-80
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
48. • Fuller K.A.
    • Bennett S.
    • Hui H.
    • et al.
    Development of a robust immuno-S-FISH protocol using imaging flow cytometry.
    Cytometry A. 2016; 89: 720-730
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
49. • Elcock L.S.
    • Bridger J.M.
    Fluorescence in situ hybridization on DNA halo preparations and extended chromatin fibres.
    Methods Mol Biol. 2010; 659: 21-31
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
50. • Knoll J.H.M.
    • Rogan P.K.
    Sequence-based, in situ detection of chromosomal abnormalities at high resolution.
    Am J Med Genet A. 2003; 121A: 245-257
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
51. • Ni Y.
    • Cao B.
    • Ma T.
    • et al.
    Super-resolution imaging of a 2.5 kb non-repetitive DNA in situ in the nuclear genome using molecular beacon probes.
    eLife. 2017; 6: e21660
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
52. • Khan W.A.
    • Chisholm R.
    • Tadayyon S.
    • et al.
    Relating centromeric topography in fixed human chromosomes to α-satellite DNA and CENP-B distribution.
    Cytogenet Genome Res. 2013; 139: 234-242
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
53. • Kyriacou E.
    • Heun P.
    High-resolution mapping of centromeric protein association using APEX-chromatin fibers.
    Epigenetics Chromatin. 2018; 11: 68
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
54. • Arrigucci R.
    • Bushkin Y.
    • Radford F.
    • et al.
    FISH-Flow, a protocol for the concurrent detection of mRNA and protein in single cells using fluorescence in situ hybridization and flow cytometry.
    Nat Protoc. 2017; 12: 1245-1260
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
55. • Wang H.
    • Nakamura M.
    • Abbott T.R.
    • et al.
    CRISPR-mediated live imaging of genome editing and transcription.
    Science. 2019; 365: 1301-1305
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
56. • Giunta S.
    Centromere chromosome orientation fluorescent in situ hybridization (Cen-CO-FISH) detects sister chromatid exchange at the centromere in human cells.
    Bio Protoc. 2018; 8: e2792
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
57. • Williams E.S.
    • Cornforth M.N.
    • Goodwin E.H.
    • et al.
    CO-FISH, COD-FISH, ReD-FISH, SKY-FISH.
    Methods Mol Biol. 2011; 735: 113-124
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
58. • Weise A.
    • Gross M.
    • Hinreiner S.
    • et al.
    POD-FISH: a new technique for parental origin determination based on copy number variation polymorphism.
    Methods Mol Biol. 2010; 659: 291-298
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
59. • Huber D.
    • Kaigala G.V.
    Rapid micro fluorescence in situ hybridization in tissue sections.
    Biomicrofluidics. 2018; 12: 042212
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
60. • Beliveau B.J.
    • Kishi J.Y.
    • Nir G.
    • et al.
    OligoMiner provides a rapid, flexible environment for the design of genome-scale oligonucleotide in situ hybridization probes.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115: E2183-E2192
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar