Applications of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Subchromosomal Copy Number Variations Using Cell-Free DNA

References

1. • Lo Y.M.
   • Corbetta N.
   • Chamberlain P.F.
   • et al.
   Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum.
   Lancet. 1997; 350: 485-487
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
2. • Bianchi D.W.
   • Chiu R.W.K.
   Sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA during pregnancy.
   N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 464-473
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Gadsboll K.
   • Petersen O.B.
   • Gatinois V.
   • et al.
   Current use of noninvasive prenatal testing in Europe, Australia and the USA: a graphical presentation.
   Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020; 99: 722-730
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Van Den Bogaert K.
   • Lannoo L.
   • Brison N.
   • et al.
   Outcome of publicly funded nationwide first-tier noninvasive prenatal screening.
   Genet Med. 2021; 23: 1137-1142
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Wapner R.J.
   • Martin C.L.
   • Levy B.
   • et al.
   Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis.
   N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 2175-2184
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • Wang H.
   • Dong Z.
   • Zhang R.
   • et al.
   Low-pass genome sequencing versus chromosomal microarray analysis: implementation in prenatal diagnosis.
   Genet Med. 2020; 22: 500-510
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Capalbo A.
   • Rienzi L.
   • Ubaldi F.M.
   Diagnosis and clinical management of duplications and deletions.
   Fertil Steril. 2017; 107: 12-18
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
8. • Gregg A.R.
   • Skotko B.G.
   • Benkendorf J.L.
   • et al.
   Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, 2016 update: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
   Genet Med. 2016; 18: 1056-1065
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Liang D.
   • Cram D.S.
   • Tan H.
   • et al.
   Clinical utility of noninvasive prenatal screening for expanded chromosome disease syndromes.
   Genet Med. 2019; 21: 1998-2006
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • van der Meij K.R.M.
    • Sistermans E.A.
    • Macville M.V.E.
    • et al.
    TRIDENT-2: national implementation of genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing as a first-tier screening test in the Netherlands.
    Am J Hum Genet. 2019; 105: 1091-1101
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • Liao G.J.
    • Chan K.C.
    • Jiang P.
    • et al.
    Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal trisomy 21 by allelic ratio analysis using targeted massively parallel sequencing of maternal plasma DNA.
    PLoS One. 2012; 7: e38154
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • Chiu R.W.
    • Chan K.C.
    • Gao Y.
    • et al.
    Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy by massively parallel genomic sequencing of DNA in maternal plasma.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105: 20458-20463
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • Helgeson J.
    • Wardrop J.
    • Boomer T.
    • et al.
    Clinical outcome of subchromosomal events detected by whole-genome noninvasive prenatal testing.
    Prenat Diagn. 2015; 35: 999-1004
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
14. • Wapner R.J.
    • Babiarz J.E.
    • Levy B.
    • et al.
    Expanding the scope of noninvasive prenatal testing: detection of fetal microdeletion syndromes.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212: 332 e1-9
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. • Martin K.
    • Iyengar S.
    • Kalyan A.
    • et al.
    Clinical experience with a single-nucleotide polymorphism-based non-invasive prenatal test for five clinically significant microdeletions.
    Clin Genet. 2018; 93: 293-300
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Lefkowitz R.B.
    • Tynan J.A.
    • Liu T.
    • et al.
    Clinical validation of a noninvasive prenatal test for genomewide detection of fetal copy number variants.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215: 227.e1-227.e16
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • Li R.
    • Wan J.
    • Zhang Y.
    • et al.
    Detection of fetal copy number variants by non-invasive prenatal testing for common aneuploidies.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47: 53-57
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • Liu H.
    • Gao Y.
    • Hu Z.
    • et al.
    Performance evaluation of NIPT in detection of chromosomal copy number variants using low-coverage whole-genome sequencing of plasma DNA.
    PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0159233
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • Dong Z.
    • Yan J.
    • Xu F.
    • et al.
    Genome sequencing explores complexity of chromosomal abnormalities in recurrent miscarriage.
    Am J Hum Genet. 2019; 105: 1102-1111
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. • Shaffer L.G.
    • Bejjani B.A.
    A cytogeneticist’s perspective on genomic microarrays.
    Hum Reprod Update. 2004; 10: 221-226
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • Huber D.
    • Voith von Voithenberg L.
    • Kaigala G.V.
    Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): history, limitations and what to expect from micro-scale FISH?.
    Micro Nano Eng. 2018; 1: 15-24
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • Levy B.
    • Burnside R.D.
    Are all chromosome microarrays the same? What clinicians need to know.
    Prenat Diagn. 2019; 39: 157-164
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. • Miller D.T.
    • Adam M.P.
    • Aradhya S.
    • et al.
    Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.
    Am J Hum Genet. 2010; 86: 749-764
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Dong Z.
    • Zhang J.
    • Hu P.
    • et al.
    Low-pass whole-genome sequencing in clinical cytogenetics: a validated approach.
    Genet Med. 2016; 18: 940-948
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
25. • Rose N.C.
    • Kaimal A.J.
    • Dugoff L.
    • et al.
    Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 226.
    Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 136: e48-e69
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
26. • Dondorp W.
    • de Wert G.
    • Bombard Y.
    • et al.
    Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening.
    Eur J Hum Genet. 2015; 23: 1438-1450
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
27. • Zhao C.
    • Tynan J.
    • Ehrich M.
    • et al.
    Detection of fetal subchromosomal abnormalities by sequencing circulating cell-free DNA from maternal plasma.
    Clin Chem. 2015; 61: 608-616
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
28. • Canick J.A.
    • Palomaki G.E.
    • Kloza E.M.
    • et al.
    The impact of maternal plasma DNA fetal fraction on next generation sequencing tests for common fetal aneuploidies.
    Prenat Diagn. 2013; 33: 667-674
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
29. • Yin A.H.
    • Peng C.F.
    • Zhao X.
    • et al.
    Noninvasive detection of fetal subchromosomal abnormalities by semiconductor sequencing of maternal plasma DNA.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112: 14670-14675
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
30. • Welker N.C.
    • Lee A.K.
    • Kjolby R.A.S.
    • et al.
    High-throughput fetal fraction amplification increases analytical performance of noninvasive prenatal screening.
    Genet Med. 2021; 23: 443-450
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
31. • Liang B.
    • Li H.
    • He Q.
    • et al.
    Enrichment of the fetal fraction in non-invasive prenatal screening reduces maternal background interference.
    Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 17675
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
32. • Hu P.
    • Liang D.
    • Chen Y.
    • et al.
    An enrichment method to increase cell-free fetal DNA fraction and significantly reduce false negatives and test failures for non-invasive prenatal screening: a feasibility study.
    J Transl Med. 2019; 17: 124
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
33. • He Q.Z.
    • Wu X.J.
    • He Q.Y.
    • et al.
    A method for improving the accuracy of non-invasive prenatal screening by cell-free foetal DNA size selection.
    Br J Biomed Sci. 2018; 75: 133-138
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
34. • Quail M.A.
    • Gu Y.
    • Swerdlow H.
    • et al.
    Evaluation and optimisation of preparative semi-automated electrophoresis systems for Illumina library preparation.
    Electrophoresis. 2012; 33: 3521-3528
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
35. • Vong J.S.L.
    • Jiang P.
    • Cheng S.H.
    • et al.
    Enrichment of fetal and maternal long cell-free DNA fragments from maternal plasma following DNA repair.
    Prenat Diagn. 2019; 39: 88-99
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
36. • Lo Y.M.
    • Chan K.C.
    • Sun H.
    • et al.
    Maternal plasma DNA sequencing reveals the genome-wide genetic and mutational profile of the fetus.
    Sci Transl Med. 2010; 2: 61ra91
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
37. • Fan H.C.
    • Blumenfeld Y.J.
    • Chitkara U.
    • et al.
    Analysis of the size distributions of fetal and maternal cell-free DNA by paired-end sequencing.
    Clin Chem. 2010; 56: 1279-1286
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
38. • Zhang B.
    • Zhao S.
    • Wan H.
    • et al.
    High-resolution DNA size enrichment using a magnetic nano-platform and application in non-invasive prenatal testing.
    Analyst. 2020; 145: 5733-5739
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
39. • Qiao L.
    • Yu B.
    • Liang Y.
    • et al.
    Sequencing shorter cfDNA fragments improves the fetal DNA fraction in noninvasive prenatal testing.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 221: 345.e1-345.e11
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
40. • Qiao L.
    • Zhang Q.
    • Liang Y.
    • et al.
    Sequencing of short cfDNA fragments in NIPT improves fetal fraction with higher maternal BMI and early gestational age.
    Am J Transl Res. 2019; 11: 4450-4459
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
41. • Quail M.A.
    • Swerdlow H.
    • Turner D.J.
    Improved protocols for the Illumina genome analyzer sequencing system.
    Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2009; (Chapter 18:Unit 18 2)
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
42. • Lo K.K.
    • Karampetsou E.
    • Boustred C.
    • et al.
    Limited clinical utility of non-invasive prenatal testing for subchromosomal abnormalities.
    Am J Hum Genet. 2016; 98: 34-44
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
43. • Rampasek L.
    • Arbabi A.
    • Brudno M.
    Probabilistic method for detecting copy number variation in a fetal genome using maternal plasma sequencing.
    Bioinformatics. 2014; 30: i212-i218
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
44. • Srinivasan A.
    • Bianchi D.W.
    • Huang H.
    • et al.
    Noninvasive detection of fetal subchromosome abnormalities via deep sequencing of maternal plasma.
    Am J Hum Genet. 2013; 92: 167-176
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
45. • Kucharik M.
    • Gnip A.
    • Hyblova M.
    • et al.
    Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by low coverage genomic sequencing: detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions.
    PLoS One. 2020; 15: e0238245
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
46. • Liao C.
    • Yin A.H.
    • Peng C.F.
    • et al.
    Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies by semiconductor sequencing.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111: 7415-7420
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
47. • Maya I.
    • Sharony R.
    • Yacobson S.
    • et al.
    When genotype is not predictive of phenotype: implications for genetic counseling based on 21,594 chromosomal microarray analysis examinations.
    Genet Med. 2018; 20: 128-131
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
48. • Rosenfeld J.A.
    • Coe B.P.
    • Eichler E.E.
    • et al.
    Estimates of penetrance for recurrent pathogenic copy-number variations.
    Genet Med. 2013; 15: 478-481
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
49. • Hu H.
    • Wang L.
    • Wu J.
    • et al.
    Noninvasive prenatal testing for chromosome aneuploidies and subchromosomal microdeletions/microduplications in a cohort of 8141 single pregnancies.
    Hum Genomics. 2019; 13: 14
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
50. • Riggs E.R.
    • Andersen E.F.
    • Cherry A.M.
    • et al.
    Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen).
    Genet Med. 2020; 22: 245-257
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
51. • Girirajan S.
    • Rosenfeld J.A.
    • Coe B.P.
    • et al.
    Phenotypic heterogeneity of genomic disorders and rare copy-number variants.
    N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 1321-1331
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
52. • Sachs A.
    • Blanchard L.
    • Buchanan A.
    • et al.
    Recommended pre-test counseling points for noninvasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA: a 2015 perspective.
    Prenat Diagn. 2015; 35: 968-971
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
53. • McDonald-McGinn D.M.
    • Hain H.S.
    • Emanuel B.S.
    • et al.
    22q11.2 deletion syndrome.
    in: Adam M.P. Ardinger H.H. Pagon R.A. GeneReviews® [Internet]. University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle (WA)2020: 1993-2021 (Available at:)
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1523/
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
54. • Driscoll D.J.
    • Miller J.L.
    • Schwartz S.
    • et al.
    Prader-Willi syndrome.
    in: Adam M.P. Ardinger H.H. Pagon R.A. GeneReviews® [Internet]. University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle (WA)1998: 1993-2021 (Available at:)
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1330/
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
55. • Dagli A.I.
    • Mueller J.
    • CA W.
    Angelman syndrome.
    in: Adam M.P. Ardinger H.H. Pagon R.A. GeneReviews® [Internet]. University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle (WA)1998 (1993-2021. Available at:)
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1144/
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
56. • Cerruti Mainardi P.
    Cri du chat syndrome.
    Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006; 1: 33
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
57. • Firth H.V.
    • Richards S.M.
    • Bevan A.P.
    • et al.
    DECIPHER: Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources.
    Am J Hum Genet. 2009; 84: 524-533
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
58. • Jordan V.K.
    • Zaveri H.P.
    • Scott D.A.
    1p36 deletion syndrome: an update.
    Appl Clin Genet. 2015; 8: 189-200
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
59. • Battaglia A.
    • Carey J.C.
    • ST S.
    Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome – RETIRED CHAPTER, FOR HISTORICAL REFERENCE ONLY.
    ([Updated 2015 Aug 20])in: Adam M.P. Ardinger H.H. Pagon R.A. GeneReviews® [Internet]. University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle (WA)2002 (1993-2021. Available at:)
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1183/
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
60. • Battaglia A.
    • Carey J.C.
    • South S.T.
    Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome: a review and update.
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2015; 169: 216-223
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
61. • Mattina T.
    • Perrotta C.S.
    • Grossfeld P.
    Jacobsen syndrome.
    Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2009; 4: 9
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
62. • Maas S.
    • Shaw A.
    • Bikker H.
    • et al.
    Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome.
    in: Adam M.P. Ardinger H.H. Pagon R.A. GeneReviews® [Internet]. University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle (WA)2017: 1993-2021 (Available at:)
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK425926/
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar