Next-Generation Sequencing Approaches to Predicting Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Results

References

1. • O’Neil J.
   Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations, the review on antimicrobial resistance.
   2016 (Available at:)
   https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/160518_Final%20paper_with%20cover.pdf
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
2. • Ardal C.
   • Outterson K.
   • Hoffman S.J.
   • et al.
   International cooperation to improve access to and sustain effectiveness of antimicrobials.
   Lancet. 2016; 387: 296-307
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Peacock S.J.
   • Parkhill J.
   • Brown N.M.
   Changing the paradigm for hospital outbreak detection by leading with genomic surveillance of nosocomial pathogens.
   Microbiology. 2018; 164: 1213-1219
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Schurch A.C.
   • van Schaik W.
   Challenges and opportunities for whole-genome sequencing-based surveillance of antibiotic resistance.
   Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017; 1388: 108-120
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Haidar G.
   • Philips N.J.
   • Shields R.K.
   • et al.
   Ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of multidrug-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: clinical effectiveness and evolution of resistance.
   Clin Infect Dis. 2017; 65: 110-120
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • Shields R.K.
   • Chen L.
   • Cheng S.
   • et al.
   Emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance due to plasmid-borne blaKPC-3 mutations during treatment of carbapenem-resistant klebsiella pneumoniae infections.
   Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017; 61 ([pii:e02097-16])
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Simner P.J.
   • Antar A.A.R.
   • Hao S.
   • et al.
   Antibiotic pressure on the acquisition and loss of antibiotic resistance genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae.
   J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018; 73: 1796-1803
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
8. • Li J.
   • Rettedal E.A.
   • van der Helm E.
   • et al.
   Antibiotic treatment drives the diversification of the human gut resistome.
   Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2019; 17: 39-51
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Lanza V.F.
   • Baquero F.
   • Martinez J.L.
   • et al.
   In-depth resistome analysis by targeted metagenomics.
   Microbiome. 2018; 6: 11
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Su M.
    • Satola S.W.
    • Read T.D.
    Genome-based prediction of bacterial antibiotic resistance.
    J Clin Microbiol. 2019; 57 ([pii:e01405-18])
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • EUCAST
    Breakpoints tables for interpretation MICs and zone diameter, version 12.
    2022 (Available at:)
    http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
    Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow Aerobically, S29.
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne (PA)2019
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
    Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically.
    11th edition. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne (PA)2018
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
14. • Banerjee R.
    • Teng C.B.
    • Cunningham S.A.
    • et al.
    Randomized trial of rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based blood culture identification and susceptibility testing.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2015; 61: 1071-1080
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. • Ameur A.
    • Kloosterman W.P.
    • Hestand M.S.
    Single-molecule sequencing: towards clinical applications.
    Trends Biotechnol. 2019; 37: 72-85
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Mitchell S.L.
    • Simner P.J.
    Next-Generation Sequencing in Clinical Microbiology: Are We There Yet?.
    Clin Lab Med. 2019; 39: 405-418
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • Tamma P.D.
    • Fan Y.
    • Bergman Y.
    • et al.
    Applying rapid whole-genome sequencing to predict phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing results among carbapenem-resistant klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019; 63 ([pii:e01923-18])
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • Cao M.D.
    • Ganesamoorthy D.
    • Elliott A.G.
    • et al.
    Streaming algorithms for identification of pathogens and antibiotic resistance potential from real-time MinION(TM) sequencing.
    Gigascience. 2016; 5: 32
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • Lemon J.K.
    • Khil P.P.
    • Frank K.M.
    • et al.
    Rapid nanopore sequencing of plasmids and resistance gene detection in clinical isolates.
    J Clin Microbiol. 2017; 55: 3530-3543
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. • Břinda K.
    • Callendrello A.
    • Cowley L.
    • et al.
    Lineage calling can identify antibiotic resistance clones within minutes.
    Pathog Dis. 2018; 76
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • Ellington M.J.
    • Ekelund O.
    • Aarestrup F.M.
    • et al.
    The role of whole genome sequencing in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria: report from the EUCAST Subcommittee.
    Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017; 23: 2-22
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • Jia B.
    • Raphenya A.R.
    • Alcock B.
    • et al.
    CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45: D566-D573
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. • Zankari E.
    • Hasman H.
    • Cosentino S.
    • et al.
    Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes.
    J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012; 67: 2640-2644
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Mason A.
    • Foster D.
    • Bradley P.
    • et al.
    Accuracy of different bioinformatics methods in detecting antibiotic resistance and virulence factors from staphylococcus aureus whole-genome sequences.
    J Clin Microbiol. 2018; 56 ([pii:e01815-17])
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
25. • Stoesser N.
    • Batty E.M.
    • Eyre D.W.
    • et al.
    Predicting antimicrobial susceptibilities for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates using whole genomic sequence data.
    J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013; 68: 2234-2244
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
26. • Zhao S.
    • Tyson G.H.
    • Chen Y.
    • et al.
    Whole-genome sequencing analysis accurately predicts antimicrobial resistance phenotypes in campylobacter spp.
    Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016; 82: 459-466
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
27. • Sadouki Z.
    • Day M.R.
    • Doumith M.
    • et al.
    Comparison of phenotypic and WGS-derived antimicrobial resistance profiles of Shigella sonnei isolated from cases of diarrhoeal disease in England and Wales, 2015.
    J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017; 72: 2496-2502
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
28. • McDermott P.F.
    • Tyson G.H.
    • Kabera C.
    • et al.
    Whole-genome sequencing for detecting antimicrobial resistance in nontyphoidal salmonella.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016; 60: 5515-5520
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
29. • Day M.R.
    • Doumith M.
    • Do Nascimento V.
    • et al.
    Comparison of phenotypic and WGS-derived antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi.
    J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018; 73: 365-372
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
30. • Shelburne 3rd, S.A.
    • Lasky R.E.
    • Sahasrabhojane P.
    • et al.
    Development and validation of a clinical model to predict the presence of beta-lactam resistance in viridans group streptococci causing bacteremia in neutropenic cancer patients.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 59: 223-230
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
31. • Phaku P.
    • Lebughe M.
    • Strauss L.
    • et al.
    Unveiling the molecular basis of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus from the Democratic Republic of the Congo using whole genome sequencing.
    Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016; 22: 644.e1-5
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
32. • Gordon N.C.
    • Price J.R.
    • Cole K.
    • et al.
    Prediction of Staphylococcus aureus antimicrobial resistance by whole-genome sequencing.
    J Clin Microbiol. 2014; 52: 1182-1191
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
33. • Tyson G.H.
    • Sabo J.L.
    • Rice-Trujillo C.
    • et al.
    Whole-genome sequencing based characterization of antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus.
    Pathog Dis. 2018; 76
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
34. • Kos V.N.
    • Deraspe M.
    • McLaughlin R.E.
    • et al.
    The resistome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in relationship to phenotypic susceptibility.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015; 59: 427-436
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
35. • Mahe P.
    • Tournoud M.
    Predicting bacterial resistance from whole-genome sequences using k-mers and stability selection.
    BMC Bioinformatics. 2018; 19: 383
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
36. • Davis J.J.
    • Boisvert S.
    • Brettin T.
    • et al.
    Antimicrobial resistance prediction in PATRIC and RAST.
    Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 27930
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
37. • Nguyen M.
    • Long S.W.
    • McDermott P.F.
    • et al.
    Using machine learning to predict antimicrobial mics and associated genomic features for nontyphoidal salmonella.
    J Clin Microbiol. 2019; 57 ([pii:e01260-18])
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
38. • Nguyen M.
    • Brettin T.
    • Long S.W.
    • et al.
    Developing an in silico minimum inhibitory concentration panel test for Klebsiella pneumoniae.
    Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 421
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
39. • Moradigaravand D.
    • Palm M.
    • Farewell A.
    • et al.
    Prediction of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from large-scale pan-genome data.
    PLoS Comput Biol. 2018; 14: e1006258
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
40. • Li Y.
    • Metcalf B.J.
    • Chochua S.
    • et al.
    Validation of beta-lactam minimum inhibitory concentration predictions for pneumococcal isolates with newly encountered penicillin binding protein (PBP) sequences.
    BMC Genomics. 2017; 18: 621
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
41. • Eyre D.W.
    • De Silva D.
    • Cole K.
    • et al.
    WGS to predict antibiotic MICs for Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
    J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017; 72: 1937-1947
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
42. • Feliciano C.S.
    • Namburete E.I.
    • Rodrigues Placa J.
    • et al.
    Accuracy of whole genome sequencing versus phenotypic (MGIT) and commercial molecular tests for detection of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from patients in Brazil and Mozambique.
    Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2018; 110: 59-67
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
43. • Coll F.
    • McNerney R.
    • Preston M.D.
    • et al.
    Rapid determination of anti-tuberculosis drug resistance from whole-genome sequences.
    Genome Med. 2015; 7: 51
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
44. • Walker T.M.
    • Kohl T.A.
    • Omar S.V.
    • et al.
    Whole-genome sequencing for prediction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug susceptibility and resistance: a retrospective cohort study.
    Lancet Infect Dis. 2015; 15: 1193-1202
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
45. • Chatterjee A.
    • Nilgiriwala K.
    • Saranath D.
    • et al.
    Whole genome sequencing of clinical strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Mumbai, India: a potential tool for determining drug-resistance and strain lineage.
    Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2017; 107: 63-72
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
46. • Ezewudo M.
    • Borens A.
    • Chiner-Oms A.
    • et al.
    Integrating standardized whole genome sequence analysis with a global Mycobacterium tuberculosis antibiotic resistance knowledgebase.
    Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 15382
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
47. • Quan T.P.
    • Bawa Z.
    • Foster D.
    • et al.
    Evaluation of whole-genome sequencing for mycobacterial species identification and drug susceptibility testing in a clinical setting: a large-scale prospective assessment of performance against line probe assays and phenotyping.
    J Clin Microbiol. 2018; 56 ([pii:e01480-17])
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
48. • Ruppe E.
    • Lazarevic V.
    • Girard M.
    • et al.
    Clinical metagenomics of bone and joint infections: a proof of concept study.
    Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 7718
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
49. • Yan Q.
    • Wi Y.M.
    • Thoendel M.J.
    • et al.
    Evaluation of the CosmosID bioinformatics platform for prosthetic joint-associated sonicate fluid shotgun metagenomic data analysis.
    J Clin Microbiol. 2019; 57 ([pii:e01182-18])
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
50. • Simner P.J.
    • Miller S.
    • Carroll K.C.
    Understanding the promises and hurdles of metagenomic next-generation sequencing as a diagnostic tool for infectious diseases.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2018; 66: 778-788
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
51. • Carter G.P.
    • Schultz M.B.
    • Baines S.L.
    • et al.
    Topical antibiotic use coselects for the carriage of mobile genetic elements conferring resistance to unrelated antimicrobials in staphylococcus aureus.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018; 62 ([pii:e02000-17])
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
52. • Hoffmann M.
    • Pettengill J.B.
    • Gonzalez-Escalona N.
    • et al.
    Comparative sequence analysis of multidrug-resistant IncA/C plasmids from salmonella enterica.
    Front Microbiol. 2017; 8: 1459
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
53. • Hujer A.M.
    • Higgins P.G.
    • Rudin S.D.
    • et al.
    Nosocomial outbreak of extensively drug-resistant acinetobacter baumannii isolates containing blaOXA-237 carried on a plasmid.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017; 61 ([pii:e00797-17])
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
54. • Judge K.
    • Hunt M.
    • Reuter S.
    • et al.
    Comparison of bacterial genome assembly software for MinION data and their applicability to medical microbiology.
    Microb Genom. 2016; 2: e000085
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
55. • Schmidt K.
    • Mwaigwisya S.
    • Crossman L.C.
    • et al.
    Identification of bacterial pathogens and antimicrobial resistance directly from clinical urines by nanopore-based metagenomic sequencing.
    J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017; 72: 104-114
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
56. • Golparian D.
    • Dona V.
    • Sanchez-Buso L.
    • et al.
    Antimicrobial resistance prediction and phylogenetic analysis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates using the Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencer.
    Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 17596
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
57. • Gire S.K.
    • Goba A.
    • Andersen K.G.
    • et al.
    Genomic surveillance elucidates Ebola virus origin and transmission during the 2014 outbreak.
    Science. 2014; 345: 1369-1372
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
58. • de Oliveira W.K.
    • Carmo E.H.
    • Henriques C.M.
    • et al.
    Zika virus infection and associated neurologic disorders in Brazil.
    N Engl J Med. 2017; 376: 1591-1593
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
59. • Kos V.N.
    • McLaughlin R.E.
    • Gardner H.A.
    Elucidation of mechanisms of ceftazidime resistance among clinical isolates of pseudomonas aeruginosa by using genomic data.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016; 60: 3856-3861
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
60. • Allix-Beguec C.
    • Arandjelovic I.
    • Bi L.
    • et al.
    Prediction of susceptibility to first-line tuberculosis drugs by DNA sequencing.
    N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 1403-1415
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar