Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 5, ISSUE 4, P761-791, December 1985

Cost Containment in Microbiology

  • Raymond C. Bartlett
    Correspondence
    Division of Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut 06115
    Affiliations
    Professor, Laboratory Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine; and Director, Division of Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      Cost containment in microbiology will require that the laboratory introduce controls on ordering and specimen submission. Laboratory personnel must also establish criteria to limit the extent of specimen processing to the production of information that can be expected to be clinically useful. This will involve a close interaction with infectious disease services and clinical departments.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bartlett R.C.
        How far to go—how fast to go.
        in: Lorian V. Significance of Medical Microbiology in the Care of Patients. Edition 2. Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore1981
        • Bartlett R.C.
        Making optimum use of the microbiology laboratory: I. Use of the laboratory.
        J.A.M.A. 1982; 247: 857-859
        • Bartlett R.C.
        Making optimum use of the microbiology laboratory: II. Urine, respiratory, wound, and cervicovaginal exudate.
        J.A.M.A. 1982; 247: 1336-1338
        • Bartlett R.C.
        Making optimum use of the microbiology laboratory: III. Aids of antimicrobial therapy.
        J.A.M.A. 1982; 247: 1868-1871
        • Bartlett R.C.
        Quality control in clinical microbiology.
        in: Lennette E.H. Balows A. Hausier W.J. Shadomy H.J. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.1985: 15-18
        • Bartlett R.C.
        • Allen V.D.
        • Blazevic D.J.
        • et al.
        Quality assurance in clinical microbiology.
        in: Inhorn S. Quality Assurance Practices for Health Laboratories. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.1978: 871-1005
        • Bartlett J.G.
        • Brewer N.S.
        • Ryan K.J.
        Laboratory Diagnosis of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections.
        American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.1978
        • Bartlett R.C.
        • Kohan T.S.
        • Rutz C.
        Comparative costs of microbial identification employing conventional and prepackaged commercial systems.
        Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1979; 71: 194-200
        • Bartlett R.C.
        • Mazens M.F.
        • Testa M.A.
        Differentiation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae in direct smears based on measurements by scanning electron microscopy.
        Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1985; 3: 143-147
        • Bartlett R.C.
        • O’Neill D.
        • McLaughlin J.C.
        Detection of bacteriuria by leukocyteesterase, nitrite and the automicrobic system.
        Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1984; 82: 683-687
        • Bartlett R.C.
        • Rutz C.
        Processing control and cost in bacteriology.
        Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1980; 74: 287-296
        • Bartlett R.C.
        • Treiber N.
        Clinical significance of mixed bacterial cultures of urine.
        Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1984; 82: 319-322
        • College of American Pathologists
        A Workload Recording Method for Clinical Laboratories.
        College of American Pathologists, Chicago1985
      1. Ellner, P. E.: Unpublished data.

        • Loo S.Y.T.
        • Scottolini A.G.
        • Luangphinith S.
        • et al.
        Urine screening strategy employing dipstick analysis and selective culture: An evaluation.
        Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1984; 81: 634-642
        • McLaughlin J.C.
        • Evers J.L.
        • Officer J.L.
        Lack of requirement for blind subcultures of BACTEC blood culture media.
        J. Clin. Microbiol. 1981; 14: 567-570
        • Overton K.
        • Tones P.
        • Tones R.N.
        A new reagent strip for urinalysis.
        Pathologist. 1984; 38: 356-361
        • Quintiliani R.
        Therapeutic conference. What’s new in third generation cephalosporins: Pharmacokinetics and cost effectiveness.
        Infect. Surg. 1984; 5: 784-791
        • Sommers H.M.
        Clinical relevance in microbiology. Proc. CAP Conference.
        CAP, Aspen, Skokie, Illinois1979
      2. Sputum questionnaire. Clin. Microbiol. News., 1:14, 1979.

        • Stamm W.E.
        • Counts G.W.
        • Running K.R.
        • et al.
        Diagnosis of coliform infection in acutely dysuric women.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 1982; 307: 463-468