The Workload Recording Method: A Laboratory Management Tool

References

1. • Ackerman V.P.
   • Berriman P.S.
   Assessment of workload in the microbiology laboratory.
   Pathology. 1977; 9: 207
   • Scopus (2)
   • PubMed
   • Abstract
   • Full Text PDF
   • Google Scholar
2. • Aller R.
   • Weilert M.
   • Pasia O.
   More labs using lab information systems.
   CAP Today. 1990; 4: 42
   • Google Scholar
3. • Balkonis B.J.
   How to perform CAP workload recording method time studies.
   Pathologist. 1980; 34 (10): 533
   • Google Scholar
4. • Balkonis B.J.
   The CAP time study; source of workload unit values.
   Medical Laboratory Observer. 1978; 9: 103
   • Google Scholar
5. • Balkonis-Barrett B.
   Changes in workload recording for 1982.
   Medical Laboratory Observer. 1982; 1: 75
   • Google Scholar
6. • Balkonis-Barrett B.
   College of American Pathologists time study volunteers wanted.
   Laboratory Medicine. 1981; 12: 575
   • Crossref
   • Google Scholar
7. • Barrett B.
   • Cox Jr., R.S.
   • Lundberg G.D.
   Lab management memo; what’s new in the 1985 workload recording manual?.
   Pathologist. 1985; 39: 10
   • Google Scholar
8. • Bartlett R.C.
   CAP workload recording.
   Clinical Microbiology Newsletter. 1989; 11: 68
   • Scopus (3)
   • Abstract
   • Full Text PDF
   • Google Scholar
9. • Becan-McBride K.
   • Lewis S.
   Organization and supervision.
   in: Becan-McBride K. Textbook of Clinical Laboratory Supervision. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Norwalk, CT1982: 29
   • Google Scholar
10. • Black H.S.
    Introducing and managing change in the clinical lab.
    MLO. 1981; 9: 115
    • Google Scholar
11. • Braun B.E.
    • Statland B.E.
    Test cost analysis in the clinical laboratory.
    MLO. 1981; 7: 59
    • Google Scholar
12. • Burch E.E.
    Productivity: Its meaning and measurement.
    Atlanta Economic Review. 1974; 5: 43
    • Google Scholar
13. College of American Pathologists: Manual for Laboratory Workload Recording Method. College of American Pathologists, Skokie, IL1991
    • Google Scholar
14. • Cox Jr., R.S.
    Philosophy and quality control: Workload recording—Why your laboratory should be in the data bank.
    Pathologist. 1984; 38: 469
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. • Cramer P.
    Lab management memo: 1982 workload recording and automated chemistry revisions.
    Pathologist. 1982; 36: 347
    • Google Scholar
16. • Cramer P.
    Lab management memo: The workload recording method catalog for improving laboratory management.
    Pathologist. 1981; 35: 11
    • Google Scholar
17. • Durrett C.
    How workload statistics can pin down test costs.
    MLO. 1978; 8: 85
    • Google Scholar
18. • Elin R.J.
    • Robertson E.A.
    • Server G.A.
    Workload, space, and personnel of microbiology laboratories in teaching hospitals.
    Am J Clin Pathol. 1984; 82: 78
    • Scopus (5)
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
19. • Goldberg A.J.
    Looking into the future of workload recording.
    MLO. 1978; 9: 115
    • Google Scholar
20. • Hardwick D.F.
    • Morrison J.L.
    Directing the Clinical Laboratory. Field & Wood Publishers, New York1990
    • Google Scholar
21. • Hendricks E.J.
    • Langhofer L.A.
    • Marsh H.H.
    How to set up fiscal control in the lab.
    MLO. 1980; 12: 121
    • Google Scholar

22. Herkimer Jr AG: Appendix A—Format of laboratory workload recording method. In Understanding Hospital Financial Management. Aspen Systems Corporation, Germantown, MD, 1978, 285

    • Google Scholar
23. • Holloway L.A.
    Laboratory productivity: Assessing productivity in the laboratory.
    Hospitals. 1982; 8: 92
    • Google Scholar
24. • Holloway L.A.
    Workload recording: A dynamic management tool for clinical microbiology.
    ASM News. 1982; 49: 92
    • Google Scholar
25. • Jaberg C.E.
    • Shank L.
    • Potter J.L.
    The impact of non-revenue producing activities.
    MLO. 1983; 3: 81
    • Google Scholar
26. • Jambor L.
    How workload data can justify equipment buys.
    MLO. 1978; 8: 75
    • Google Scholar
27. • Jones III., P.F.
    Graph your workload to pinpoint staffing needs.
    MLO. 1981; 8: 59
    • Google Scholar
28. • Koch J.
    Workload measures key to productivity boost.
    CAP Today. 1990; 4: 47
    • Google Scholar
29. • Koch J.
    Few revisions in workload method.
    CAP Today. 1991; 5: 42
    • Google Scholar
30. • Kosinski D.S.
    • Klevinski C.
    A simple workload recording system that your entire staff can use.
    MLO. 1990; 22: 65
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. • Lindner C.A.
    • Helms A.S.
    • Shaw B.W.
    An alternative method for measuring workload.
    MLO. 1986; 18: 43
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. • Longest B.B.
    Staffing aspects of the organizing function.
    Cadence. 1973; 7: 41
    • Google Scholar
33. • Lundberg G.D.
    • Westlake G.E.
    Cost containment in the clinical laboratory—To be or to seem to be, or when is a nontest a test?.
    JAMA. 1980; 243: 1659
    • Scopus (11)
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
34. • Lundberg G.D.
    Lab management memo: The CAP workload recording method—Is it good?.
    Pathologist. 1982; 36: 10
    • Google Scholar
35. • Mack D.J.
    Using workload statistics for manpower forecasting.
    MLO. 1978; 8: 65
    • Google Scholar
36. • Maffei L.M.
    A new approach to workload recording. A contemporary approach to staffing analysis.
    Clinical Lab Management Review. 1990; 4: 105
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. • Murphy G.H.
    A workload recording method for clinical laboratories.
    Laboratory Medicine. 1972; 7: 18
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
38. • Olsen K.E.
    • Durej R.J.
    A laboratory productivity monitoring system.
    American Journal of Medical Technology. 1981; 47 (8): 631
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. • Pang C.Y.
    • Swint J.M.
    Forecasting staffing needs for productivity management in hospital laboratories.
    Journal of Medical Systems. 1985; 9: 365
    • Scopus (7)
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
40. • Penner D.W.
    The workload recording method for the clinical laboratory—A dynamic and ever continually evolving system; problems relating to remaining valid and coping with significant reductions in unit values in clinical chemistry.
    Can J Med Technol. 1981; 43: 224
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. • Penner D.W.
    The workload recording method; a management tool for the clinical laboratory.
    Hum Pathol. 1982; 13 (4): 393
    • Scopus (4)
    • PubMed
    • Abstract
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
42. • Penner D.W.
    Lab management memo: Crisis for the laboratory workload recording method?.
    Pathologist. 1980; 34: 443
    • Google Scholar
43. • Penner D.W.
    Lab management memo: Laboratory workload recording time studies progress report.
    Pathologist. 1981; 35: 367
    • Google Scholar
44. • Penner D.W.
    Changes in the workload recording method? What they mean and how to cope.
    Pathologist. 1982; 36: 27
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. • Peters T.J.
    • Waterman Jr., R.H.
    Search of Excellence. Warner Books/Harper & Row, New York1983: 7
    • Google Scholar
46. • Pierson J.
    A new look at laboratory costs.
    Clinical Lab Management Review. 1988; 2: 291
    • Google Scholar
47. • Portugal B.
    Factors influencing relative financial performance of hospital laboratories.
    Clinical Lab Management Review. 1989; 3: 81
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. • Rachel F.M.
    • Caruth D.L.
    Work measurement: A valuable tool for management.
    Management Services. 1969; 1: 23
    • Google Scholar
49. • Reed L.B.
    Assessing productivity and staffing through workload recording.
    MLO. 1979; 9: 147
    • Google Scholar
50. • Reed L.B.
    Workload recording with a new wrinkle.
    Laboratory Management. 1977; 3: 46
    • Google Scholar
51. • Sattler J.
    • Smith A.
    Workload recording system and staffing.
    A Practical Guide to Financial Management of the Clinical Laboratory. ed 2. Oradell, NY, Medical Economics Books1986: 20
    • Google Scholar
52. • Sinton E.B.
    Lab management memo: Workload recording method; an internal management tool.
    Pathologist. 1979; 33: 116
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. • Sinton E.B.
    Lab management memo: The workload recording committee and its liaisons.
    Pathologist. 1979; 33: 659
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. • Sinton E.B.
    Lab management memo: Workload recording: How the CAP method evolved.
    Pathologist. 1978; 32: 17
    • Google Scholar
55. • Sinton E.B.
    What workload recording can do for you.
    MLO. 1978; 8: 49
    • Google Scholar
56. • Sinton E.B.
    Workload recording: Now you need it more than ever.
    MLO. 1976; 5: 127
    • Google Scholar
57. • Templin Jr., J.L.
    Specified hours: A new approach to calculating productivity.
    MLO. 1980; 6: 83
    • Google Scholar
58. • Umiker W.O.
    Strategies for boosting lab productivity.
    MLO. 1982; 9: 60
    • Google Scholar
59. • Vorus J.
    Workload recording.
    in: Kami K.R. Viskochil K.R. Amos P.A. Clinical Laboratory Management: A Guide for Clinical Laboratory Scientists. Little, Brown, Boston1982: 323
    • Google Scholar
60. • Werner M.
    An easy way to determine your cost per test.
    MLO. 1981; 3: 67
    • Google Scholar
61. • Winkelman J.
    • Aitken J.
    • Wybenga D.
    Cost savings in a hospital clinical laboratory with a pay-for-performance program for supervisors.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991; 115: 38
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. • Witebsky F.
    • Cundy K.
    New developments in CAP workload recording for microbiology.
    ASM News. 1984; 50: 477
    • Google Scholar