Research Article| Volume 18, ISSUE 1, P151-180, March 1998

Download started.


Image Processing in Forensic Pathology

  • William R. Oliver
    Address reprint requests to William R. Oliver, MD, Deputy Medical Examiner, Office of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC 20306-6000
    From the Office of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      Image processing applications in forensic pathology are becoming increasingly important. This article introduces basic concepts in image processing as applied to problems in forensic pathology in a non-mathematical context. Discussions of contrast enhancement, digital encoding, compression, deblurring, and other topics are presented.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.


      Subscribe to Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Altschuler B.
        • Oliver W.R.
        • Altschuler M.
        Rapid 3-D video /laser and digital archiving with immediate on-scene feedback for 3-D crime scene/mass disaster data collection and reconstruction.
        Proc 1995 Applied Imagery and Pattern Recognition: Tools and Techniques for Modeling and Simulation. SPIE. 1995; 2645: 32-38
        • Banham M.R.
        • Katsaggelos A.K.
        Digital image restoration.
        IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. 1997; 14: 24-41
        • Black J.A.
        Application of digital image enhancement software with the Macintosh computer to questioned document problems.
        J Forensic Sei. 1992; 37: 783-796
        • Bodziak W.
        Footwear Impression Evidence.
        Elsevier, New York1990: 162-164
      1. Castleman K: Digital Image Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1996, pp 91-94, 247-249, 389

        • Gauch J.M.
        Investigations of image contrast space defined by variations on histogram equalization.
        CVGIP: Graphics Models and Image Processing. 1992; 54: 269-280
        • Hill B.
        • Roger T.
        • Vorhagen F.W.
        Comparative analysis of the quantization of color spaces on the bases of the CIELAB color difference formula.
        ACM Transactions on Computer Graphics. 1997; 16: 109-154
        • Jensen S.C.
        • Rudin L.I.
        Measure: An interactive tool for accurate forensic photo/video- grammetry.
        Proc SPIE Conf Investigative and Trial Image Processing, July 13-14, 1995. SPIE. 1995; 2567: 73-83
        • Katsaggelos A.K.
        Digital Image Restoration.
        Springer-Verlag, Berlin1991: 243
        • Kundur D.
        • Hutzenakos D.
        Blind image deconvolution.
        IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. 1996; 13: 43-69
        • Lawrence R.D.
        Inaccuracy of measuring wounds on autopsy photographs.
        Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1985; 6: 17-18
        • Mallat S.C.
        A theory of multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation.
        IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 1989; 11: 674-693
        • Manoloakis D.
        • Orr J.A.
        • Kok A.
        Low-cost automatic contrast enhancement for digital x- rays.
        Visual Information Processing: SPIE Proceedings. 1992; 1705: 194-197
        • Martin H.
        • McNamara M.J.
        94 color films compared.
        Popular Photography. 1997; 61: 60-64
      2. Mlsna A, Rodreguez JJ: Explosion of multidimensional image histograms. Proc IEEE Inti Conf on Image Processing, vol III. Austin, TX, Nov 13-16, 1994, pp 960-962

        • Oliver W.R.
        • Chancellor A.S.
        • Soltys M.
        • et al.
        Three-dimensional reconstruction of a bullet path: Validation by computed radiography.
        J Forensic Sei. 1995; 40: 321-324
        • Oliver W.R.
        • Wagner G.
        • Rosenman J.
        • et al.
        Image processing and three-dimensional reconstruction in the evaluation of blunt force and patterned injury: The AFIP/UNC experience in the Rodney King case.
        Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1997; 18: 1-10
        • Quan W.
        • Clarke L.P.
        • Zheng B.
        • et al.
        Computer assisted diagnosis for digital mammography.
        IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology. 1995; 14: 561-599
        • Rudin L.
        • Oscher J.
        • Fatemi F.
        Nonlinear total variation-based noise removal algorithm.
        Physica D. 1992; 60: 259-262
      3. Russ J: The Image Processing Handbook, ed 2. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 1994, pp 114-150, 182-193, 211-225, 320-321

        • Whitaker R.
        • Pizer S.M.
        A multiscale approach to nonuniform diffusion.
        CVGIP: Image Understanding. 1993; 57: 111-120
        • Wolf P.
        Elements of Photogrammetry.
        ed 2. McGraw-Hill, New York1983: 628
        • Wyszecki G.
        • Stiles W.S.
        Visual thresholds. In Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae.
        ed 2. John Wiley and Sons, New York1982: 514-582