This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
The doctrine of sovereign or official immunity has protected medical examiners in cases alleging negligent performance of the autopsy and in cases involving negligent harvesting of organs. It has not protected examiners in cases alleging performance of autopsy without authorization. The medical examiner, therefore, is well advised to determine whether there may be any objection by the next-of-kin to an autopsy and particularly any religious objection-and if there is such an objection, to proceed only after making contemporaneous and documented decision that there is a compelling need for the autopsy.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.
Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.
Subscribe:Subscribe to Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
© 1998 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.