Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 19, ISSUE 4, P743-756, December 1999

Diagnostic Errors in Surgical Pathology

  • Neal S. Goldstein
    Correspondence
    Address reprint requests to: Neal S. Goldstein, MD, Department of Anatomic Pathology, William Beaumont Hospital, 3601 West 13 Mile Road, Royal Oak, MI 48073
    Affiliations
    From the Department of Anatomic Pathology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
    Search for articles by this author
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-2712(18)30087-8
Diagnostic Errors in Surgical Pathology
Previous ArticleMonitoring Anatomic Pathology Practice Through Quality Assurance Measures
Next ArticleCost-Effectiveness Analysis in Pathology
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      This article discusses the concept of diagnostic error in surgical pathology and how surgical pathologists attempt to decrease diagnostic error. Emphasis is placed on currently used error reduction methods.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ackerman L.V.
        • Ramirez G.A.
        The indications for and limitations of frozen section diagnoses: A review of 1269 consecutive frozen section diagnoses.
        Br J Surg. 1958; 46: 350
        • Barnett R.N.
        • Richman L.W.
        Accuracy of rapid frozen section diagnosis in a community hospital: A review of 10 years experience at the Norwalk Hospital.
        Conn Med. 1983; 47: 463-465
        • Bianchi S.
        • Vezzosi V.
        • Palli D.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative histological study of nonpalpable lesions of the breast.
        Chir Ital. 1995; 47: 9-14
        • Bredahl E.
        • Simonsen J.
        Routine performance of intra-operative frozen section microscopy, with particular reference to diagnostic accuracy.
        Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1970; 212: 104-111
        • Breuer M.J.
        Frozen-section biopsy at operation.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 1938; 8: 153-169
        • Caya J.G.
        Accuracy of breast frozen section diagnosis in the community hospital setting: A detailed analysis of 628 cases.
        Wis Med J. 1991; 90: 58-61
        • Chan M.K.
        • McGuire L.J.
        • King W.
        • et al.
        Cytodiagnosis of 112 salivary gland lesions: Correlation with histologic and frozen section diagnosis.
        Acta Cytol. 1992; 36: 353-363
        • Cree I.A.
        • Guthrie W.
        • Anderson J.M.
        • et al.
        Departmental audit in histopathology.
        Pathol Res Pract. 1993; 189: 453-457
        • Cross S.S.
        Grading and scoring in histopathology.
        Histopathology. 1998; 33: 99-106
        • da Cunha B.
        • Salvatore C.A.
        • Faria R.M.
        Frozen section biopsy of ovarian neoplasms.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1983; 21: 103-110
        • Dalel B.I.
        • Malik A.K.
        • Datta B.N.
        Frozen section diagnosis: A review of 1051 cases.
        Ind J Cancer. 1979; 16: 59-65
        • Dankwa E.K.
        • Davies J.D.
        Frozen section diagnosis: An audit.
        J Clin Pathol. 1985; 38: 1235-1240
        • Dehner L.P.
        • Rosai J.
        Frozen section examination in surgical pathology.
        Minn Med. 1977; 60: 83-94
        • Dindzans L.J.
        • VanNostrand A.W.
        The accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of parotid lesions.
        J Otolaryngol. 1984; 13: 383-386
        • Epstein J.I.
        • Walsh P.C.
        • Sanfilippo F.
        Clinical and cost impact of second-opinion pathology: Review of prostate biopsies prior to radical prostatectomy.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 1996; 20: 851-857
        • Eskelinen M.
        • Collan Y.
        • Puittinen J.
        • Valkamo E.
        Frozen section diagnosis of breast cancer.
        Acta Oncol. 1989; 28: 183-186
        • Ferreiro J.A.
        • Gisvold J.J.
        • Bostwick D.G.
        Accuracy of frozen-section diagnosis of mammo-graphically detected breast biopsies: Results of 1490 consecutive cases.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 1995; 19: 1267-1271
        • Fessia L.
        • Ghiringhello B.
        • Arisio R.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in breast cancer detection: A review of 4436 biopsies and comparison with cytodiagnosis.
        Pathol Res Pract. 1984; 179: 61-66
        • Funkhouser J.W.
        • Oosting M.
        • Zipf R.
        • Wenyon C.E.M.
        Evaluation of frozen sections using the cryostat analysis of 1176 consecutive cases.
        Am Surg. 1966; 32: 416-418
        • Furness P.N.
        • Lauder I.A.
        A questionnaire-based survey of errors in diagnostic histopathology throughout the United Kingdom.
        J Clin Pathol. 1997; 50: 457-460
        • Gandour-Edwards R.F.
        • Donald P.J.
        • Wiese D.A.
        Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section diagnosis in head and neck surgery: Experience at a university medical center.
        Head Neck. 1993; 15: 33-38
        • Gephardt G.N.
        • Rice T.W.
        Utility of frozen-section evaluation of lymph nodes in the staging of bronchogenic carcinoma at mediastinoscopy and thoracotomy.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990; 100: 853-859
        • Gnepp D.R.
        • Rader W.R.
        • Cramer S.F.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of the salivary gland.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987; 96: 325-330
        • Granick M.S.
        • Erickson E.R.
        • Hanna D.C.
        Accuracy of frozen-section diagnosis in salivary gland lesions.
        Head Neck Surg. 1985; 7: 465-467
        • Hamed F.
        • Badia J.
        • Chuaqui R.
        • et al.
        Role of frozen section biopsy in the diagnosis of adnexal neoplasms.
        Rev Chii Obstet Ginecol. 1993; 58: 361-364
        • Heller K.S.
        • Attie J.N.
        • Dubner S.
        Accuracy of frozen section in the evaluation of salivary tumors.
        Am J Surg. 1993; 166: 424-427
        • Hermanek P.
        Intraoperative diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma.
        Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1983; 359: 289
        • Hillel A.D.
        • Fee W.E.J.
        Evaluation of frozen section in parotid gland surgery.
        Arch Otolaryngol. 1983; 109: 230-232
        • Holaday W.J.
        • Assor D.
        Ten thousand consecutive frozen sections: A retrospective study focusing on accuracy and quality control.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 1974; 61: 769-777
        • Horn R.C.
        What can be expected of the surgical pathologist from frozen section examination.
        Surg Clin North Am. 1962; 42: 443-454
        • Howanitz P.J.
        • Hoffman G.G.
        • Zarbo R.J.
        The accuracy of frozen-section diagnoses in 34 hospitals.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1990; 114: 355-359
        • Hwang T.S.
        • Ham E.K.
        • Kim C.W.
        • et al.
        An evaluation of frozen section biopsy in 4434 cases.
        J Korean Med Sci. 1987; 2: 239-245
        • Irish J.C.
        • van Nostrand A.W.
        • Asa S.L.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of pathologic diagnosis in thyroid lesions.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992; 118: 918-922
        • Jacques S.M.
        • Qureshi F.
        • Munkarah A.
        • Lawrence W.D.
        Interinstitutional surgical pathology review in gynecologic oncology I. Cancer in endometrial curettings and biopsies.
        Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1998; 17: 36-41
        • Jacques S.M.
        • Qureshi F.
        • Munkarah A.
        • Lawrence W.D.
        Interinstitutional surgical pathology review in gynecologic oncology. II. Endometrial cancer in hysterectomy specimens.
        Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1998; 17: 36-41
        • Jennings E.R.
        • Landers J.W.
        The use of frozen section in cancer diagnosis.
        Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1957; 104: 60-62
        • Kaufman Z.
        • Lew S.
        • Griddel B.
        • Dinbar A.
        Frozen-section diagnosis in surgical pathology: A prospective analysis of 526 frozen sections.
        Cancer. 1986; 57: 377-379
        • Lerman R.I.
        • Pitcock J.A.
        Frozen section experience in 3249 specimens.
        Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1972; 135: 930-932
        • Lesna M.
        Assessing diagnostic errors: When is suspension of a pathologist justified?.
        J Clin Pathol. 1998; 51: 649-651
        • Lessells A.M.
        • Simpson J.G.
        A retrospective analysis of the accuracy of immediate frozen section diagnosis in surgical pathology.
        Br J Surg. 1976; 63: 327-329
        • Lind A.C.
        • Bewtra C.
        • Healy J.C.
        • et al.
        Prospective peer review in surgical pathology.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 1995; 104: 560-566
        • Macartney J.C.
        • Henson D.E.
        • Codling B.W.
        Quality assurance in anatomic pathology.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 1981; 7: 467-475
        • Murthy M.S.
        • Derman H.
        Quality assurance in surgical pathology—personal and peer assessment.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 1981; 75: 462-466
        • Nakazawa H.
        • Rosen P.
        • Lane N.
        • Lattes R.
        Frozen section experience in 3000 cases: Accuracy, limitations, and value in residency training.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 1968; 49: 41-51
        • Obiakor I.
        • Maiman M.
        • Mittal K.
        • et al.
        The accuracy of frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian neoplasms.
        Gynecol Oncol. 1991; 43: 61-63
        • Oneson R.H.
        • Minke J.A.
        • Silverberg S.G.
        Intraoperative pathologic consultation: An audit of 1000 recent consecutive cases.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 1989; 13: 237-243
        • Owen D.A.
        • Tighe J.R.
        Quality evaluation in histopathology [letter].
        BMJ. 1975; 1: 149-150
        • Penner D.W.
        Quality control and quality evaluation in histopathology and cytology.
        Path Ann. 1973; 8: 1-19
        • Prey M.U.
        • Vitale T.
        • Martin S.A.
        Guidelines for practical utilization of intraoperative frozen sections.
        Arch Surg. 1989; 124: 331-335
        • Ramsay A.D.
        Locally organized medical audit in histopathology.
        J Clin Pathol. 1991; 44: 353-357
        • Ramsay A.D.
        • Gallagher P.J.
        Local audit of surgical pathology.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 1992; 16: 476-482
        • Remsen K.A.
        • Lucente F.E.
        • Biller H.F.
        Reliability of frozen section diagnosis in head and neck neoplasms.
        Laryngoscope. 1984; 94: 519-524
        • Roders C.
        • Klatt E.C.
        • Chandrasoma P.
        Accuracy of frozen-section diagnosis in a teaching hospital.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1987; 111: 514-517
        • Rose P.G.
        • Rubin R.B.
        • Nelson B.E.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of frozen-section (intraoperative consultation) diagnosis of ovarian tumors.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 171: 823-826
        • Safrin R.E.
        • Back C.J.
        Surgical pathology signout: Routine review of every case by a second pathologist.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 1993; 17: 1190-1192
        • Saltzstein S.L.
        • Nahum A.M.
        Frozen section diagnosis: Accuracy and errors; uses and abuses.
        Laryngoscope. 1973; 83: 1128-1143
        • Sawady J.
        • Berner J.J.
        • Siegler E.
        Accuracy of and reasons for frozen sections: A correlative, retrospective study.
        Hum Pathol. 1988; 19: 1019-1023
        • Scopa C.D.
        • Melachrinou M.
        • Panagiotopoulou C.
        • Grekou A.N.
        Frozen section diagnosis: A quality control study.
        Int Surg. 1990; 75: 195-197
        • Sherwood A.J.
        • C’Hunt A.
        An external quality assessment scheme in histopathology.
        J Clin Pathol. 1984; 37: 414
        • Stanely M.W.
        Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: The role of professional organizations in reform initiatives.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997; 121: 327-330
        • Torp S.H.
        • Skjorten F.J.
        The reliability of frozen section diagnosis.
        Acta Chir Scand. 1990; 156: 127-130
        • Whitehead M.E.
        • Fitzwater J.E.
        • Lindsay S.K.
        • et al.
        Quality assurance of histopathologic diagnoses: A prospective audit of three thousand cases.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 1984; 81: 487-491
        • Whitehead M.E.
        • Grieve J.H.K.
        • Payne M.J.
        • Ross M.S.
        Quality assurance of histopathologic diagnosis in the British Army: Role of the Army Histopathologic Registry in completed case review.
        J R Army Med Corps. 1986; 132: 71-75
        • Whitehead T.P.
        • Woodford F.P.
        External quality assessment of clinical laboratories in the United Kingdom.
        J Clin Pathol. 1981; 34: 947-957
        • Wilson L.B.
        A method for the rapid preparation of fresh tissue for the microscope.
        JAMA. 1905; 45: 1737
        • Winship T.
        • Rosvall R.V.
        Frozen sections: An evaluation of 1810 cases.
        Surgery. 1959; 45: 462-466
        • Zarbo R.J.
        • Hoffman G.G.
        • Howanitz P.J.
        Interinstitutinal comparison of frozen-section consultation.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991; 115: 1187-1194
        • Zuk J.A.
        • Kenyon W.E.
        • Myskow M.W.
        Audit in histopathology: Description of an internal quality assessment scheme with analysis of preliminary results.
        J Clin Pathol. 1991; 44: 10-16

      Article info

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-2712(18)30087-8

      Copyright

      © 1999 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect
      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties. The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      RELX