Review Article| Volume 37, ISSUE 1, P119-135, March 2017

Metrological Traceability of Assays and Comparability of Patient Test Results


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.


      Subscribe to Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Greenberg N.
        Update on current concepts and meanings in laboratory medicine: standardization, traceability and harmonization.
        Clin Chim Acta. 2014; 432: 49-54
        • Armbruster D.
        • Donnelly J.
        Harmonization of clinical laboratory test results: the role of the IVD industry.
        EJIFCC. 2016; 27: 37-47
        • Miller W.G.
        • Myers G.L.
        • Gantzer M.L.
        • et al.
        Roadmap for harmonization of clinical laboratory measurements procedures.
        Clin Chem. 2011; 57: 1108-1117
        • Tate J.R.
        • Johnson R.
        • Barth J.
        • et al.
        Harmonization of laboratory testing- current achievements and future strategies.
        Clin Chim Acta. 2014; 432: 4-7
        • McLawhon R.W.
        Patient safety and clinical effectiveness as imperatives for achieving harmonization inside and outside the clinical laboratory.
        Clin Chem. 2011; 57: 936-938
        • White G.H.
        Metrological traceability in clinical biochemistry.
        Ann Clin Biochem. 2011; 48: 393-409
        • Miller W.G.
        • Myers G.L.
        Commutability still matters.
        Clin Chem. 2013; 59: 1291-1293
        • Beastall G.H.
        Adding value to laboratory medicine: a professional responsibility.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013; 51: 221-227
        • Gantzer M.L.
        • Miller W.G.
        Harmonisation of measurement procedures: how do we get it done?.
        Clin Biochem Rev. 2012; 33: 95-100
        • Malone B.
        A jumpstart on harmonization.
        Clinical Laboratory News. 2010; 36: 12
        • Hernandez J.S.
        • Dale J.C.
        • Bennet K.
        • et al.
        Challenges and opportunities for medical directors in pathology and laboratory medicine.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 2010; 133: 8-13
        • Stephan C.
        • Siemben K.
        • Camman H.
        • et al.
        Between-method differences in prostate-specific antigen assays affect prostate cancer risk prediction by nomograms.
        Clin Chem. 2011; 57: 995-1004
        • Panteghini M.
        Traceability as a unique tool to improve standardization in laboratory medicine.
        Clin Biochem. 2009; 42: 236-240
        • Armbruster D.
        • Miller R.R.
        The Joint Committee on Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (JCTLM): a global approach to promote the standardization of clinical laboratory results.
        Clin Biochem. 2007; 28: 105-113
        • Morris H.A.
        Traceability and standardization of immunoassays: a major challenge.
        Clin Biochem. 2009; 42: 241-245
        • NIST
        Planning report 04-1, the impact of calibration error in medical decision making.
        National Institute for Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg (MD)2004
        • Hallworth M.J.
        The ‘70% claim’: what is the evidence base?.
        Ann Clin Biochem. 2011; 48: 487-488
        • Tate J.R.
        • Johnson R.
        • Barth J.H.
        Harmonization of laboratory testing- a global activity.
        Clin Chim Acta. 2014; 432 ([Editorial]): 1-3
        • Teodoro-Morrison T.
        • Janssen M.J.W.
        • Mols J.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of a next generation direct whole blood enzymatic assay for hemoglobin A1c on the ARCHITECT c8000 chemistry system.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015; 53: 125-132
      1. Burtis C.A. Ashwood E.R. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry. 3rd edition. W.B. Saunders Co, Philadelphia1999
      2. Burtis C.A. Ashwood E.R. Bruns D.E. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics. 4th edition. W.B. Saunders Co, Philadelphia2006
      3. Burtis C.A. Ashwood E.R. Bruns D.E. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics. 5th edition. W.B. Saunders Co, Philadelphia2011
        • De Bievre P.
        Metrological traceability of measurement results in chemistry: concepts and implementation. IUPAC Technical Report.
        Pure Appl Chem. 2011; 83: 1873-1935
        • Greenberg N.
        The IVD directive and availability of reference systems for IVD medical devices: a view from Industry.
        IVD Technology. 2001; 7: 18-27
        • Powers D.M.
        Traceability of assay calibrators: the EU’s IVD Directive raises the bar.
        IVD Technology. 2000; (July – August)
        • Vesper H.W.
        • Thienpont L.M.
        Traceability in laboratory medicine.
        Clin Chem. 2009; 55: 1067-1075
        • ISO 17511
        In vitro diagnostic medical devices - measurement of quantities in biological samples - metrological traceability of values assigned to calibrators and control materials.
        International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland2003
        • ISO 15189
        Medical laboratories — requirements for quality and competence.
        International Organization for Standardization, 2012
        • CLSI EP21
        Expression of measurement uncertainty in laboratory medicine.
        Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne (PA)2012
        • Dybkaer R.
        From total allowable error via metrological traceability to uncertainty of measurement of the unbiased result.
        Accred Qual Assur. 1999; 4: 401-405
        • Armbruster D.
        Measurement traceability and US IVD manufacturers: the impact of metrology.
        Accred Qual Assur. 2009; 14: 393-398
        • Panteghini M.
        Traceability, reference systems and result comparability.
        Clin Biochem Rev. 2007; 28: 97-104
        • Braga F.
        • Panteghini M.
        Verification of in vitro medical diagnostics (IVD) metrological traceability: responsibilities and strategies.
        Clin Chim Acta. 2014; 432: 55-61
      4. Available at: Accessed March 19, 2016.

        • Bunk D.M.
        Reference materials and reference measurement procedures: an overview from a national metrology institute.
        Clin Biochem Rev. 2007; 28: 131-137
        • Fasce C.F.
        • Rej R.
        • Copeland W.H.
        • et al.
        A discussion of enzyme reference materials: applications and specifications.
        Clin Chem. 1973; 19: 5-9
        • Rej R.
        Accurate enzyme activity measurements.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993; 117: 352-364
        • Miller W.G.
        • Jones G.R.D.
        • Horowitz G.L.
        • et al.
        Proficiency testing external quality assessment: current challenges and future directions.
        Clin Chem. 2011; 57: 1670-1680
        • Miller W.G.
        • Myers G.L.
        • Rej R.
        Why commutability matters.
        Clin Chem. 2006; 52: 553-554
        • CLSI EP30
        Characterization and qualification of commutable reference materials for laboratory medicine.
        Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne (PA)2010
        • Horowitz G.L.
        Proficiency testing matters.
        Clin Chem. 2013; 59: 335-337
        • Miller W.G.
        • Myers G.L.
        • Ashwood E.R.
        • et al.
        State of the art in trueness and interlaboratory harmonization for 10 analytes in general clinical chemistry.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008; 132: 838-846
        • Miller W.G.
        The role of proficiency testing in achieving standardization and harmonization between laboratories.
        Clin Biochem. 2009; 42: 232-235
        • Jansen R.
        • Schumann G.
        • Baadenhuijsen H.
        • et al.
        Trueness verification and traceability assessment of results from commercial systems for measurement of six enzyme activities in serum: an international study in the EC4 framework of the Calibration 2000 project.
        Clin Chim Acta. 2006; 368: 160-167
        • Levine D.M.
        • Maine G.T.
        • Armbruster D.A.
        • et al.
        The need for standardization of tacrolimus assays.
        Clin Chem. 2011; 57: 1739-1747
        • Plebani M.
        Harmonization in laboratory medicine: the complete picture.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013; 51: 741-751
        • Thienpont L.M.
        Accuracy in clinical chemistry- Who will kiss Sleeping Beauty awake?.
        Clin Chem. 2008; 46: 1220-1222
        • Bais R.
        • Armbruster D.
        • Jansen R.T.P.
        • et al.
        Defining acceptable limits for the metrological traceability of specific measurands.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013; 51: 973-976
        • Berg J.
        • Lane V.
        Pathology Harmony; a pragmatic and scientific approach to unfounded variation in the clinical laboratory.
        Ann Clin Biochem. 2011; 48: 195-197
        • Legg M.
        Standardisation of test requesting and reporting for the electronic health record.
        Clin Chim Acta. 2014; 432: 148-156
        • Tate J.R.
        • Johnson R.
        • Legg M.
        Haromonisation of laboratory testing.
        Clin Biochem Rev. 2012; 33: 81-84
        • Jones G.R.D.
        • Jackson C.
        The Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (JCTLM)- Its history and operation.
        Clin Chim Acta. 2016; 453: 86-94
        • Aarsand A.K.
        • Sandberg S.
        How to achieve harmonization of laboratory testing- the complete picture.
        Clin Chim Acta. 2014; 432: 8-14