Review Article| Volume 37, ISSUE 1, P47-56, March 2017

Biologic Variation Approach to Daily Laboratory

Published:December 13, 2016DOI:


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.


      Subscribe to Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Fraser C.G.
        The nature of biological variation.
        in: Biological variation: from principles to practice. AACC Press, Washington, DC2001: 1-28
        • Panteghini M.
        • Sandberg S.
        Defining analytical performance specifications 15 years after the Stockholm conference.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015; 53: 829-832
        • Simundic A.M.
        • Bartlett A.W.
        • Fraser C.G.
        Biological variation: a still evolved facet of laboratory medicine.
        Ann Clin Biochem. 2015; 52: 189-190
        • Fraser C.G.
        • Harris E.K.
        Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry.
        Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 1989; 27: 409-437
        • Ricós C.
        • Ávarez V.
        • Cava F.
        • et al.
        Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress.
        Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999; 59 (In: Hyltoft Petersen P, Fraser CG, Kallner A, et al. Strategies to set global quality specifications in laboratory medicine): 491-500
      1. Minchinela J, Ricós C, Perich C, et al. Biological variation database and quality specifications for imprecision bias and total error (desirable and minimum). The 2014 update. Available at: Accessed September 15, 2016.

        • Aarsand A.
        • Roraas T.
        • Sverre S.
        Biological variation- reliable data is essential. Clin Chem.
        Lab Med. 2015; 53: 153-154
        • Carobene A.
        Reliability of a biological variation data available in an online database: need for improvement.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015; 53: 801-807
        • Bartlett W.A.
        • Braga F.
        • Carobene A.
        • et al.
        A checklist for critical appraisal of studies on biological variation.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015; 53: 879-885
      2. Elevitch F.R. 1976 aspen conference on analytical goals in clinical chemistry. College of American Pathologists, Skokie (IL)1977
        • Fraser C.G.
        Quality specifications.
        in: Biological variation: from principles to practice. AACC Press, Washington, DC2001: 29-66
        • Gowans E.M.S.
        • Hyltoft Petersen P.
        • Blaabjerg O.
        • et al.
        Analytical goals for the acceptance of reference intervals for laboratories throughout a geographical area.
        Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1988; 48: 757-764
        • Ricós C.
        • Baadenhuijsen H.
        • Libeer J.C.
        • et al.
        Currently used criteria for evaluating performance in EQA in European countries and a proposal for harmonization.
        Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1996; 34 (Also in: Uldall A. Compendium on advanced external quality assurance in clinical biochemistry. DEKS. Herlev University Hospital. Denmark 2000): 159-165
        • Oosterhuis W.P.
        • Sandberg S.
        Proposal for the modification of the conventional model for establishing performance specifications.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015; 53: 925-937
        • Fraser C.G.
        • Hyltoft Petersen P.
        • Libeer J.C.
        • et al.
        Proposals for setting generally applicable quality goals solely based on biology.
        Ann Clin Biochem. 1997; 34: 8-12
        • Westgard J.O.
        Six sigma basics.
        in: Six sigma quality design and control. Westgard QC Inc, Madison (WI)2006: 69-91
        • Westgard J.O.
        Charts of Operational Process Spacificatins (“OPSpects charts”) for assessing the accuracy, precision and quality control needed to satisfy proficiency testing performance criteria.
        Clin Chem. 1992; 38: 1226-1233
      3. Ramón F, Alsina MJ, Álvarez V, et al. XXXVI Programa de Garantía Externa de la Calidad de Bioquímica suero de la SEQC. 2015. Available at: Programas%202015/40.Suero.pdf. Accessed October 5, 2016.

        • Ricós C.
        • Álvarez V.
        • Perich C.
        • et al.
        Rationale for using data on biological variation.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015; 53: 863-870
        • Harris E.K.
        Statistical aspects of reference values in clinical pathology.
        Prog Clin Pathol. 1981; 8: 45-66
        • Cooper G.
        • DeJonge N.
        • Ehrmeyer S.
        • et al.
        Collective opinion paper on findings of the 2010 convocation of experts on laboratory quality.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011; 49: 793-802
        • Fraser C.G.
        Improved monitoring of differences in serial laboratory results.
        Clin Chem. 2011; 57: 1635-1637
        • Ricós C.
        • Iglesias N.
        • García-Lario J.V.
        • et al.
        Within-subject biological variation in disease: collate data and clinical consequences.
        Ann Clin Biochem. 2007; 44: 343-352
        • Fokkema M.R.
        • Herrmann Z.
        • Muskiet F.A.
        • et al.
        Reference change values for brain natriuretic peptides revisited.
        Clin Chem. 2006; 52: 1602-1603
        • Roraas T.
        • Stove B.
        • Hyltoft Petersen P.
        • et al.
        Biological variation: the effect of different distributions on estimated within-person variation and reference change values.
        Clin Chem. 2016; 62: 725-736
        • Auxter-Parham S.
        Taking autoverification to the next level: new tools make it easier to increase efficiency.
        Clin Lab News. 2003; 29: 11
        • Dunikoski L.K.
        The advantages of autoverification.
        Adv form Med Lab Professionals. 2003; 15: 25
        • Fraser C.G.
        • Stevenson H.P.
        • Kennedy I.M.G.
        Biological variation data are necessary prerequisites for objective autoverification of clinical laboratory data.
        Accred Qual Assur. 2002; 7: 455-460