Review Article| Volume 37, ISSUE 1, P1-13, March 2017

Measuring Analytical Quality

Total Analytical Error Versus Measurement Uncertainty
Published:December 20, 2016DOI:


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.


      Subscribe to Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Sandberg S.
        • Fraser C.G.
        • Horvath A.R.
        • et al.
        Defining analytical performance specifications: consensus statement for the 1st strategic conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015; 53: 829-953
        • Westgard J.O.
        Useful measures and models for analytical quality management in medical laboratories.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016; 54: 223-233
        • Panteghini M.
        • Sandberg S.
        Total error vs. measurement uncertainty: the match continues.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016; 54: 195-196
        • Oosterhuis W.P.
        • Theodorsson E.
        Total error vs. measurement uncertainty: revolution or evolution.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016; 54: 235-239
        • Westgard J.O.
        • Westgard S.A.
        Quality control in the age of risk management.
        Clin Lab Med. 2013; 33: 1
        • Dybkaer R.
        From total allowable error via metrological traceability to uncertainty of measurement of the unbiased results.
        Accred Qual Assur. 1999; 4: 401-405
        • Dybkaer R.
        Setting quality specifications for the future with newer approaches to defining uncertainty in laboratory medicine.
        Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999; 59: 579-584
        • Hyltoft Peterson P.
        • Fraser C.G.
        • Kallner A.
        • et al.
        Strategies to set global analytical quality specifications in laboratory medicine.
        Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999; 59: 475-585
        • Theodorsson E.
        • Magnusson B.
        • Leito I.
        Bias in clinical chemistry.
        Bioanalysis. 2014; 6: 2855-2875
        • Thienpont L.M.
        • Van Ufganghe K.
        • Cabaleiro D.R.
        Metrological traceability of calibration in the estimation and use of common medical decision-making criteria.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2004; 42: 842-850
        • Weykamp C.
        • John G.
        • Gillery P.
        • et al.
        Investigation of 2 models to set and evaluate quality targets for HbA1c: bilogic variation and sigma metrics.
        Clin Chem. 2015; 61: 752-759
        • Westgard J.O.
        • Westgard S.A.
        A graphical tool for assessing quality on the sigma-scale from proficiency testing and external quality assessment surveys.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015; 53: 1531-1536
        • Westgard J.O.
        • Westgard S.A.
        Quality control review: implementing a scientifically based quality control system.
        Ann Clin Biochem. 2016; 53: 32-50
        • ISO 15189
        Medical laboratories – requirements for quality and competence.
        ISO, Geneva (Switzerland)2012
        • Westgard J.O.
        • Hyltoft Petersen P.
        • Wiebe D.A.
        Laboratory process specifications for assuring quality in the U.S. National Cholesterol Education Program.
        Clin Chem. 1991; 37: 656-661
        • Westgard J.O.
        • Wiebe D.A.
        Cholesterol operating specifications for assuring the quality required by CLIA proficiency testing.
        Clin Chem. 1991; 37: 1938-1944
        • Westgard J.O.
        • Seehafer J.J.
        • Barry P.L.
        Allowable imprecision for laboratory tests based on clinical and analytical test outcome criteria.
        Clin Chem. 1994; 40: 1909-1914
      1. Balogh E.P. Miller B.T. Ball J.R. Board on health care services. Institute of medicine. improving diagnosis in health care. The National academies Press, Washington, DC2015
        • White G.H.
        • Farrance I.
        • AACB Uncertainty of Measurement Working Group
        Uncertainty of measurement in quantitative medical testing: a laboratory implementation guide.
        Clin Biochem Rev. 2004; 25: S1-S24
      2. JCGM 200;2012 International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM), 3rd edition 2008 version with minor corrections. Available at: Accessed February 1, 2016.

        • Farrance I.
        • Badrick T.
        • Sikaris K.A.
        Uncertainty in measurement and total error – are they so incompatible?.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016; 54: 1309-1311
        • Magnusson B.
        • Ellison S.L.R.
        Treatment of uncorrected measurement bias in uncertainty estimation for chemical measurements.
        Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008; 390: 201-213
        • Kallner A.
        Is the combination of trueness and precision in one expression meaningful? On the use of total error and uncertainty in clinical chemistry.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016; 54: 1291-1297
      3. BIPM JCGM 100: 2008. GUM 1995 with minor corrections. Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Available at: Accessed February 22, 2016.

        • Westgard J.O.
        • Westgard S.A.
        Basic quality management systems.
        (Chapter 15. Measuring the uncertainty of measurements) Westgard QC, Inc, Madison (WI)2014: 223-237