Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 33, ISSUE 4, P891-909, December 2013

Breast Carcinoma

Molecular Profiling and Updates

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Siegel R.
        • Naishadham D.
        • Jemal A.
        Cancer statistics, 2013.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2013; 63: 11-30
      1. Tavassoli F.A. Devilee P. World Health Organization classification of tumor. Pathology and genetics of tumors of the breast and female genital organs. IARC Press, Lyon (France)2003: 13-59
        • O'Brien K.M.
        • Cole S.R.
        • Tse C.K.
        • et al.
        Intrinsic breast tumor subtypes, race, and long-term survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.
        Clin Cancer Res. 2010; 16: 6100-6110
        • Patani N.
        • Martin L.A.
        • Dowsett M.
        Biomarkers for the clinical management of breast cancer: international perspective.
        Int J Cancer. 2013; 133: 1-13
        • Hammond M.E.
        ASCO-CAP guidelines for breast predictive factor testing: an update.
        Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2011; 19: 499-500
        • Perou C.M.
        • Sorlie T.
        • Eisen M.B.
        • et al.
        Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.
        Nature. 2000; 406: 747-752
        • Sorlie T.
        • Perou C.M.
        • Tibshirani R.
        • et al.
        Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98: 10869-10874
        • Sotiriou C.
        • Neo S.Y.
        • McShane L.M.
        • et al.
        Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 10393-10398
        • Prat A.
        • Cheang M.C.
        • Martin M.
        • et al.
        Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor-positive tumor cells within immunohistochemically defined luminal A breast cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31: 203-209
        • Park S.
        • Koo J.S.
        • Kim M.S.
        • et al.
        Characteristics and outcomes according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer as classified by a panel of four biomarkers using immunohistochemistry.
        Breast. 2012; 21: 50-57
        • Voduc K.D.
        • Cheang M.C.
        • Tyldesley S.
        • et al.
        Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse.
        J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 1684-1691
        • Goldhirsch A.
        • Wood W.C.
        • Coates A.S.
        • et al.
        Strategies for subtypes–dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011.
        Ann Oncol. 2011; 22: 1736-1747
        • Kim H.S.
        • Park I.
        • Cho H.J.
        • et al.
        Analysis of the potent prognostic factors in luminal-type breast cancer.
        J Breast Cancer. 2012; 15: 401-406
        • Cheang M.C.
        • Chia S.K.
        • Voduc D.
        • et al.
        Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101: 736-750
        • Wirapati P.
        • Sotiriou C.
        • Kunkel S.
        • et al.
        Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures.
        Breast Cancer Res. 2008; 10: R65
        • Guiu S.
        • Michiels S.
        • Andre F.
        • et al.
        Molecular subclasses of breast cancer: how do we define them? the IMPAKT 2012 Working Group Statement.
        Ann Oncol. 2012; 23: 2997-3006
        • Ono M.
        • Tsuda H.
        • Yunokawa M.
        • et al.
        Prognostic impact of Ki-67 labeling indices with 3 different cutoff values, histological grade, and nuclear grade in hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative invasive breast cancers.
        Breast Cancer. 2013; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Hu Z.
        • Fan C.
        • Oh D.S.
        • et al.
        The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms.
        BMC Genomics. 2006; 7: 96
        • Natrajan R.
        • Weigelt B.
        • Mackay A.
        • et al.
        An integrative genomic and transcriptomic analysis reveals molecular pathways and networks regulated by copy number aberrations in basal-like, HER2 and luminal cancers.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010; 121: 575-589
        • Wiechmann L.
        • Sampson M.
        • Stempel M.
        • et al.
        Presenting features of breast cancer differ by molecular subtype.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16: 2705-2710
        • Dowsett M.
        • Procter M.
        • McCaskill-Stevens W.
        • et al.
        Disease-free survival according to degree of HER2 amplification for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with or without 1 year of trastuzumab: the HERA Trial.
        J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 2962-2969
        • Smith I.
        • Procter M.
        • Gelber R.D.
        • HERA study team
        • et al.
        2-year follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2007; 369: 29-36
        • Gennari A.
        • Sormani M.P.
        • Pronzato P.
        • et al.
        HER2 status and efficacy of adjuvant anthracyclines in early breast cancer: a pooled analysis of randomized trials.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008; 100: 14-20
        • Hayes D.F.
        • Thor A.D.
        • Dressler L.G.
        • Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Investigators
        • et al.
        HER2 and response to paclitaxel in node-positive breast cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 1496-1506
        • Pritchard K.I.
        • Messersmith H.
        • Elavathil L.
        • et al.
        HER-2 and topoisomerase II as predictors of response to chemotherapy.
        J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 736-744
        • Goldstein N.S.
        • Decker D.
        • Severson D.
        • et al.
        Molecular classification system identifies invasive breast carcinoma patients who are most likely and those who are least likely to achieve a complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
        Cancer. 2007; 110: 1687-1696
        • Nguyen P.L.
        • Taghian A.G.
        • Katz M.S.
        • et al.
        Breast cancer subtype approximated by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 is associated with local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy.
        J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 2373-2378
        • Kennecke H.
        • Yerushalmi R.
        • Woods R.
        • et al.
        Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes.
        J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 3271-3277
        • Smid M.
        • Wang Y.
        • Zhang Y.
        • et al.
        Subtypes of breast cancer show preferential site of relapse.
        Cancer Res. 2008; 68: 3108-3114
        • Livasy C.A.
        • Karaca G.
        • Nanda R.
        • et al.
        Phenotypic evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma.
        Mod Pathol. 2006; 19: 264-271
        • Bosch A.
        • Eroles P.
        • Zaragoza R.
        • et al.
        Triple-negative breast cancer: molecular features, pathogenesis, treatment and current lines of research.
        Cancer Treat Rev. 2010; 36: 206-215
        • Carey L.A.
        • Perou C.M.
        • Livasy C.A.
        • et al.
        Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.
        JAMA. 2006; 295: 2492-2502
        • Prat A.
        • Parker J.S.
        • Karginova O.
        • et al.
        Phenotypic and molecular characterization of the claudin-low intrinsic subtype of breast cancer.
        Breast Cancer Res. 2010; 12: R68
        • Farmer P.
        • Bonnefoi H.
        • Becette V.
        • et al.
        Identification of molecular apocrine breast tumours by microarray analysis.
        Oncogene. 2005; 24: 4660-4671
        • Bhargava R.
        • Striebel J.
        • Beriwal S.
        • et al.
        Prevalence, morphologic features and proliferation indices of breast carcinoma molecular classes using immunohistochemical surrogate markers.
        Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2009; 2: 444-455
        • Moinfar F.
        • Okcu M.
        • Tsybrovskyy O.
        • et al.
        Androgen receptors frequently are expressed in breast carcinomas: potential relevance to new therapeutic strategies.
        Cancer. 2003; 98: 703-711
        • Mellinghoff I.K.
        • Vivanco I.
        • Kwon A.
        • et al.
        HER2/neu kinase-dependent modulation of androgen receptor function through effects on DNA binding and stability.
        Cancer Cell. 2004; 6: 517-527
        • Bromberg J.F.
        • Horvath C.M.
        • Wen Z.
        • et al.
        Transcriptionally active Stat1 is required for the antiproliferative effects of both interferon alpha and interferon gamma.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93: 7673-7678
        • Rakha E.A.
        • Lee A.H.
        • Evans A.J.
        • et al.
        Tubular carcinoma of the breast: further evidence to support its excellent prognosis.
        J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 99-104
        • Colleoni M.
        • Rotmensz N.
        • Maisonneuve P.
        • et al.
        Outcome of special types of luminal breast cancer.
        Ann Oncol. 2012; 23: 1428-1436
        • Montagna E.
        • Maisonneuve P.
        • Rotmensz N.
        • et al.
        Heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer: histologic subtyping to inform the outcome.
        Clin Breast Cancer. 2013; 13: 31-39
        • Weigelt B.
        • Horlings H.M.
        • Kreike B.
        • et al.
        Refinement of breast cancer classification by molecular characterization of histological special types.
        J Pathol. 2008; 216: 141-150
        • Iorfida M.
        • Maiorano E.
        • Orvieto E.
        • et al.
        Invasive lobular breast cancer: subtypes and outcome.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 133: 713-723
        • Castellana B.
        • Escuin D.
        • Perez-Olabarria M.
        • et al.
        Genetic up-regulation and overexpression of PLEKHA7 differentiates invasive lobular carcinomas from invasive ductal carcinomas.
        Hum Pathol. 2012; 43: 1902-1909
        • Gruel N.
        • Lucchesi C.
        • Raynal V.
        • et al.
        Lobular invasive carcinoma of the breast is a molecular entity distinct from luminal invasive ductal carcinoma.
        Eur J Cancer. 2010; 46: 2399-2407
        • Eusebi V.
        • Magalhaes F.
        • Azzopardi A.G.
        Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast: an aggressive tumor showing apocrine differentiation.
        Hum Pathol. 1992; 23: 655-662
        • Middleton L.P.
        • Palacios D.M.
        • Bryant B.R.
        • et al.
        Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma: morphology, immunocytochemistry and molecular analysis.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 2000; 24: 1650-1656
        • Monhollen L.
        • Morrison C.
        • Ademuyiwa F.O.
        • et al.
        Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma: a distinctive clinical and molecular breast cancer type.
        Histopathology. 2012; 61: 365-377
        • Buchanan C.L.
        • Flynn L.W.
        • Murray M.P.
        • et al.
        Is pleomorphic lobular carcinoma really a distinct clinical entity?.
        J Surg Oncol. 2008; 98: 314-317
        • Venable J.G.
        • Schwartz A.M.
        • Silverberg S.G.
        Infiltrating cribriform carcinoma of the breast: a distinctive clinicopathologic entity.
        Hum Pathol. 1990; 21: 333-338
        • Riener M.O.
        • Nikolopoulos E.
        • Herr A.
        • et al.
        Microarray comparative genomic hybridization analysis of tubular breast carcinoma shows recurrent loss of the CDH13 locus on 16q.
        Hum Pathol. 2008; 39: 1621-1629
        • Capella C.
        • Eusebi V.
        • Mann B.
        • et al.
        Endocrine differentiation in mucoid carcinoma of the breast.
        Histopathology. 1980; 4: 613-630
        • Weigelt B.
        • Geyer F.C.
        • Horlings H.M.
        • et al.
        Mucinous and neuroendocrine breast carcinomas are transcriptionally distinct from invasive ductal carcinomas of no special type.
        Mod Pathol. 2009; 22: 1401-1414
        • Lacroix-Triki M.
        • Suarez P.H.
        • MacKay A.
        • et al.
        Mucinous carcinoma of the breast is genomically distinct from invasive ductal carcinomas of no special type.
        J Pathol. 2010; 222: 282-298
        • Duprez R.
        • Wilkerson P.M.
        • Lacroix-Triki M.
        • et al.
        Immunophenotypic and genomic characterization of papillary carcinomas of the breast.
        J Pathol. 2012; 226: 427-441
        • Liu Z.Y.
        • Liu N.
        • Wang Y.H.
        • et al.
        Clinicopathologic characteristics and molecular subtypes of invasive papillary carcinoma of the breast: a large case study.
        J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013; 139: 77-84
        • Chen L.
        • Fan Y.
        • Lang R.G.
        • et al.
        Breast carcinoma with micropapillary features: clinicopathologic study and long-term follow-up of 100 cases.
        Int J Surg Pathol. 2008; 16: 155-163
        • Marchio C.
        • Iravani M.
        • Natrajan R.
        • et al.
        Genomic and immunophenotypical characterization of pure micropapillary carcinomas of the breast.
        J Pathol. 2008; 215: 398-410
        • Yamaguchi R.
        • Tanaka M.
        • Kondo K.
        • et al.
        Characteristic morphology of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: an immunohistochemical analysis.
        Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010; 40: 781-787
        • Thor A.D.
        • Eng C.
        • Devries S.
        • et al.
        Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast is associated with chromosome 8 abnormalities detected by comparative genomic hybridization.
        Hum Pathol. 2002; 33: 628-631
        • Dellapasqua S.
        • Maisonneuve P.
        • Viale G.
        • et al.
        Immunohistochemically defined subtypes and outcome of apocrine breast cancer.
        Clin Breast Cancer. 2013; 13: 95-102
        • Tsutsumi Y.
        Apocrine carcinoma as triple-negative breast cancer: novel definition of apocrine-type carcinoma as estrogen/progesterone receptor-negative and androgen receptor-positive invasive ductal carcinoma.
        Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012; 42: 375-386
        • Hennessy B.T.
        • Gonzalez-Angulo A.M.
        • Stemke-Hale K.
        • et al.
        Characterization of a naturally occurring breast cancer subset enriched in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stem cell characteristics.
        Cancer Res. 2009; 69: 4116-4124
        • Weigelt B.
        • Kreike B.
        • Reis-Filho J.S.
        Metaplastic breast carcinomas are basal-like breast cancers: a genomic profiling analysis.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009; 117: 273-280
        • Geyer F.C.
        • Weigelt B.
        • Natrajan R.
        • et al.
        Molecular analysis reveals a genetic basis for the phenotypic diversity of metaplastic breast carcinomas.
        J Pathol. 2010; 220: 562-573
        • Martinez S.R.
        • Beal S.H.
        • Canter R.J.
        • et al.
        Medullary carcinoma of the breast: a population-based perspective.
        Med Oncol. 2011; 28: 738-744
        • Li C.I.
        Risk of mortality by histologic type of breast cancer in the United States.
        Hormones & cancer. 2010; 1: 156-165
        • Vu-Nishino H.
        • Tavassoli F.A.
        • Ahrens W.A.
        • et al.
        Clinicopathologic features and long-term outcome of patients with medullary breast carcinoma managed with breast-conserving therapy (BCT).
        International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2005; 62: 1040-1047
        • Reinfuss M.
        • Stelmach A.
        • Mitus J.
        • et al.
        Typical medullary carcinoma of the breast: a clinical and pathological analysis of 52 cases.
        Journal of Surgical Oncology. 1995; 60: 89-94
        • Ridolfi R.L.
        • Rosen P.P.
        • Port A.
        • et al.
        Medullary carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic study with 10 year follow-up.
        Cancer. 1977; 40: 1365-1385
        • Bertucci F.
        • Finetti P.
        • Cervera N.
        • et al.
        Gene expression profiling shows medullary breast cancer is a subgroup of basal breast cancers.
        Cancer Res. 2006; 66: 4636-4644
        • Vincent-Salomon A.
        • Gruel N.
        • Lucchesi C.
        • et al.
        Identification of typical medullary breast carcinoma as a genomic sub-group of basal-like carcinomas, a heterogeneous new molecular entity.
        Breast Cancer Res. 2007; 9: R24
        • McDivitt R.W.
        • Stewart F.W.
        Breast carcinoma in children.
        JAMA. 1966; 195: 388-390
        • Oberman H.A.
        Secretory carcinoma of the breast in adults.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 1980; 4: 465-470
        • Lae M.
        • Freneaux P.
        • Sastre-Garau X.
        • et al.
        Secretory breast carcinomas with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene belong to the basal-like carcinoma spectrum.
        Mod Pathol. 2009; 22: 291-298
        • Lambros M.B.
        • Tan D.S.
        • Jones R.L.
        • et al.
        Genomic profile of a secretory breast cancer with an ETV6-NTRK3 duplication.
        J Clin Pathol. 2009; 62: 604-612
        • Vasudev P.
        • Onuma K.
        Secretory breast carcinoma: unique, triple-negative carcinoma with a favorable prognosis and characteristic molecular expression.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011; 135: 1606-1610
        • Brill 2nd, L.B.
        • Kanner W.A.
        • Fehr A.
        • et al.
        Analysis of MYB expression and MYB-NFIB gene fusions in adenoid cystic carcinoma and other salivary neoplasms.
        Mod Pathol. 2011; 24: 1169-1176
        • Wetterskog D.
        • Lopez-Garcia M.A.
        • Lambros M.B.
        • et al.
        Adenoid cystic carcinomas constitute a genomically distinct subgroup of triple-negative and basal-like breast cancers.
        J Pathol. 2012; 226: 84-96
        • Persson M.
        • Andren Y.
        • Mark J.
        • et al.
        Recurrent fusion of MYB and NFIB transcription factor genes in carcinomas of the breast and head and neck.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106: 18740-18744
        • Collins L.C.
        • Tamimi R.M.
        • Baer H.J.
        • et al.
        Outcome of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ untreated after diagnostic biopsy: results from the Nurses' Health Study.
        Cancer. 2005; 103: 1778-1784
        • Tsikitis V.L.
        • Chung M.A.
        Biology of ductal carcinoma in situ classification based on biologic potential.
        Am J Clin Oncol. 2006; 29: 305-310
        • Chaudhuri B.
        • Crist K.A.
        • Mucci S.
        • et al.
        Distribution of estrogen receptor in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
        Surgery. 1993; 113: 134-137
        • Barnes R.
        • Masood S.
        Potential value of hormone receptor assay in carcinoma in situ of breast.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 1990; 94: 533-537
        • Karayiannakis A.J.
        • Bastounis E.A.
        • Chatzigianni E.B.
        • et al.
        Immunohistochemical detection of oestrogen receptors in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 1996; 22: 578-582
        • Provenzano E.
        • Hopper J.L.
        • Giles G.G.
        • et al.
        Biological markers that predict clinical recurrence in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
        Eur J Cancer. 2003; 39: 622-630
        • Poller D.N.
        • Roberts E.C.
        • Bell J.A.
        • et al.
        p53 protein expression in mammary ductal carcinoma in situ: relationship to immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptor and c-erbB-2 protein.
        Hum Pathol. 1993; 24: 463-468
        • Allred D.C.
        • Wu Y.
        • Mao S.
        • et al.
        Ductal carcinoma in situ and the emergence of diversity during breast cancer evolution.
        Clin Cancer Res. 2008; 14: 370-378
        • Wiechmann L.
        • Kuerer H.M.
        The molecular journey from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer.
        Cancer. 2008; 112: 2130-2142
        • Gupta S.K.
        • Douglas-Jones A.G.
        • Fenn N.
        • et al.
        The clinical behavior of breast carcinoma is probably determined at the preinvasive stage (ductal carcinoma in situ).
        Cancer. 1997; 80: 1740-1745
        • Wallis M.G.
        • Clements K.
        • Kearins O.
        • et al.
        The effect of DCIS grade on rate, type and time to recurrence after 15 years of follow-up of screen-detected DCIS.
        Br J Cancer. 2012; 106: 1611-1617
        • Reis-Filho J.S.
        • Lakhani S.R.
        The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: genetic alterations in pre-invasive lesions.
        Breast Cancer Res. 2003; 5: 313-319
        • King T.A.
        • Sakr R.A.
        • Muhsen S.
        • et al.
        Is there a low-grade precursor pathway in breast cancer?.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19: 1115-1121
        • Allinen M.
        • Beroukhim R.
        • Cai L.
        • et al.
        Molecular characterization of the tumor microenvironment in breast cancer.
        Cancer Cell. 2004; 6: 17-32
        • Ma X.J.
        • Salunga R.
        • Tuggle J.T.
        • et al.
        Gene expression profiles of human breast cancer progression.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 5974-5979
        • Knudsen E.S.
        • Ertel A.
        • Davicioni E.
        • et al.
        Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer is associated with gene expression programs of EMT and myoepithelia.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 133: 1009-1024