Review Article| Volume 33, ISSUE 3, P567-588, September 2013

Automation in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.


      Subscribe to Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. 2007 Tuberculosis scare [Online Source]. 2013. 2-4-2013.

        • Best M.
        Strategic laboratory workforce planning—you can not afford not to do it.
        ASCP Laboratory Medicine. 2004; ([Magazine Article])
        • American Academy of Microbiology
        Clinical micrbiology in the 21st century keeping the pace.
        ([Report])American Academy of Microbiology. ASM Press, Washington, DC2008
        • California Hospital Association
        Critical roles: california allied healthcare workforce survey, report of key findings.
        ([Report]) California Hospital Association, Sacramento, CA2011
        • The Lewin Group
        Laboratory medicine: a National Status Report.
        ([Report]) The Lewin Group, Falls Church, VA2008
        • Trotman-Grant A.
        • Raney T.
        • Dien B.J.
        Evaluation of optimal storage temperature, time, and transport medium for detection of group B Streptococcus in StrepB carrot broth.
        J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50: 2446-2449
        • Van Horn K.G.
        • Audette C.D.
        • Sebeck D.
        • et al.
        Comparison of the Copan ESwab system with two Amies agar swab transport systems for maintenance of microorganism viability.
        J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46: 1655-1658
        • Van Horn K.G.
        • Audette C.D.
        • Tucker K.A.
        • et al.
        Comparison of 3 swab transport systems for direct release and recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.
        Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008; 62: 471-473
        • Greub G.
        • Prod'hom G.
        Automation in clinical bacteriology: what system to choose?.
        Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011; 17: 655-660
        • Bourbeau P.P.
        • Swartz B.L.
        First evaluation of the WASP, a new automated microbiology plating instrument.
        J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47: 1101-1106
        • Mischnik A.
        • Mieth M.
        • Busch C.J.
        • et al.
        First evaluation of automated specimen inoculation for wound swab samples by use of the Previ Isola system compared to manual inoculation in a routine laboratory: finding a cost-effective and accurate approach.
        J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50: 2732-2736
      2. Centers for medicare and medicaid services OoANHSG.
        ([Report]) National Health Care Expeditures Data, 2012
        • Young D.S.
        Laboratory automation: smart strategies and practical applications.
        Clin Chem. 2000; 46: 740-745
      3. Hamilton SD. Justifying laboratory automation. SLAS [Electronic Citation]. 11-30-2011.

      4. Hamilton SD, Kramer GW, Russo MF. An Introduction to laboratory automation. 2011.

        • Matthews S.
        • Deutekom J.
        The future of diagnostic bacteriology.
        Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011; 17: 651-654