A Novel Educational Tool for Teaching Diagnostic Reasoning and Laboratory Data Interpretation to Veterinary (and Medical) Students

Published:December 20, 2010DOI:


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.


      Subscribe to Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Ericsson K.A.
        Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains.
        Acad Med. 2004; 79: S70-S81
        • Bordage G.
        • Lemieux M.
        Semantic structures and diagnostic thinking of experts and novices.
        Acad Med. 1991; 66: S70-S72
        • Cholowski K.M.
        • Chan L.K.S.
        Diagnostic reasoning among second-year nursing students.
        J Adv Nurs. 1992; 17: 1171-1181
        • Hardin L.E.
        Cognitive processes of second-year veterinary students in clinical case resolution.
        J Vet Med Educ. 2003; 30: 236-246
        • Stevens R.H.
        Search path mapping: a versatile approach for visualizing problem-solving behavior.
        Acad Med. 1991; 66: S73-S75
        • Schwartz W.
        Documentation of students' clinical reasoning using a computer simulation.
        Am J Dis Child. 1989; 143: 575-579
        • Coderre S.
        • Mandin H.
        • Harasym P.H.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success.
        Med Educ. 2003; 37: 695-703
        • Chang R.W.
        • Bordage G.
        • Connell K.J.
        The importance of early problem representation during case presentations.
        Acad Med. 1998; 73: S109-S111
        • Rikers R.M.
        • Loyens S.M.
        • Schmidt H.G.
        The role of encapsulated knowledge in clinical case representations of medical students and family doctors.
        Med Educ. 2004; 38: 1035-1043
        • Groves M.
        • O'Rourke P.
        • Alexander H.
        The clinical reasoning characteristics of diagnostic experts.
        Med Teach. 2003; 25: 308-313
        • Ferrario C.G.
        Experienced and less-experienced nurses' diagnostic reasoning: implications for fostering students' critical thinking.
        Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2003; 14: 41-52
        • Norman G.
        Research in clinical reasoning: past history and current trends.
        Med Educ. 2005; 39: 418-427
        • Danielson J.A.
        • Bender H.S.
        • Mills E.M.
        • et al.
        A tool for helping veterinary students learn diagnostic problem solving.
        Educational Technology Research and Development. 2003; 51: 63-81
        • Danielson J.A.
        • Mills E.M.
        • Vermeer P.J.
        • et al.
        The Diagnostic Pathfinder: ten years of using technology to teach diagnostic problem solving.
        in: Scott T.B. Livingston J.I. Leading edge educational technology. Nova Science Publishers, Inc, New York2008: 77-103
        • Danielson J.A.
        • Mills E.M.
        • Vermeer P.J.
        • et al.
        Characteristics of a cognitive tool that helps students learn diagnostic problem solving.
        Educational Technology Research and Development. 2007; 55: 499-520
        • Miller G.A.
        The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.
        Psychol Rev. 1956; 63: 81-97
        • Sweller J.
        Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning.
        Cogn Sci. 1988; 12: 257-285
        • van Merrienboer J.J.
        • Sweller J.
        Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies.
        Med Educ. 2010; 44: 85-93
        • Hattie J.
        • Timperley H.
        The power of feedback.
        Rev Educ Res. 2007; 77: 81-112
        • Shute V.J.
        Focus on formative feedback.
        Rev Educ Res. 2008; 78: 153-189
        • van Gog T.
        • Ericsson K.A.
        • Rikers R.M.
        • et al.
        Instructional design for advanced learners: establishing connections between the theoretical frameworks of cognitive load and deliberate practice.
        Educational Technology Research and Development. 2005; 53: 73-81