Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 30, ISSUE 3, P593-604, September 2010

Monitoring Quality Control of Nuchal Translucency

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Cuckle H.
        • Benn P.
        Multianalyte maternal serum screening for chromosomal defects.
        in: Milunsky A. Genetic disorders and the fetus: diagnosis, prevention and treatment. 6th edition. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (MD)2009: 771-818
        • Spencer K.
        • Bindra R.
        • Nix A.B.
        • et al.
        Delta-NT or NT MoM, which is the most appropriate method for calculating accurate patient-specific risks for trisomy 21 in the first trimester?.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 22: 142-148
        • Wright D.
        • Kagan K.O.
        • Molina F.S.
        • et al.
        A mixture model of nuchal translucency thickness in screening for chromosomal defects.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 31: 376-383
        • Wald N.J.
        • Rodeck C.
        • Hackshaw A.K.
        • et al.
        First and second trimester antenatal screening for Down's syndrome: the results of the Serum, Urine and Ultrasound Screening Study (SURUSS).
        Health Technol Assess. 2003; 7: 1-88
        • Malone F.D.
        • Canick J.A.
        • Ball R.H.
        • First- and Second-Trimester Evaluation of Risk (FASTER) Research Consortium
        • et al.
        First trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome.
        N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 2001-2011
        • Wright D.
        • Bradbury I.
        • Benn P.
        • et al.
        Contingent screening for Down's syndrome is an efficient alternative to non-disclosure sequential screening.
        Prenat Diagn. 2004; 24: 762-766
        • Cuckle H.
        • Aitken D.
        • Goodburn S.
        • UK National Down's Syndrome Screening Programme, Laboratory Advisory Group
        • et al.
        Age-standardisation when target setting and auditing performance of Down syndrome screening programmes.
        Prenat Diagn. 2004; 24: 851-856
        • Canick J.A.
        • Lambert-Messerlian G.M.
        • Palomaki G.E.
        • First and Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk (FASTER) Trial Research Consortium
        • et al.
        Comparison of serum markers in first-trimester Down syndrome screening.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 1192-1199
        • Cuckle H.S.
        • Malone F.D.
        • Wright D.
        • FaSTER Research Consortium
        • et al.
        Contingent screening for Down syndrome—results from the FaSTER trial.
        Prenat Diagn. 2008; 28: 89-94
        • Weisz B.
        • Pandya P.P.
        • David A.L.
        • et al.
        Ultrasound findings after screening for Down syndrome using the integrated test.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109: 1046-1052
        • Okun N.
        • Summers A.
        • Hoffman B.
        • et al.
        Prospective experience with integrated prenatal screening and first trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 in a large Canadian urban center.
        Prenat Diagn. 2008; 8: 987-992
        • Wald N.J.
        • Huttly W.J.
        • Murphy K.W.
        • et al.
        Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome using the Integrated test at two London hospitals.
        J Med Screen. 2009; 16: 7-10
        • Rodrigues L.C.
        • Ramos-Dias A.M.
        • Carvalho V.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of four years of prenatal screening for aneuploidies in Hospital S. Francisco Xavier using the integrated test.
        J Med Screen. 2009; 16: 46-47
        • Benn P.A.
        • Campbell W.A.
        • Zelop C.M.
        • et al.
        Stepwise sequential screening for fetal aneuploidy.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197 (e1–5): 312
        • Snijders R.J.
        • Thom E.A.
        • Zachary J.M.
        • et al.
        First-trimester trisomy screening: nuchal translucency measurement training and quality assurance to correct and unify technique.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 19: 353-359
        • Herman A.
        • Maymon R.
        • Dreazen E.
        • et al.
        Nuchal translucency audit: a novel image-scoring method.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 12: 398-403
        • Wøjdemann K.R.
        • Christiansen M.
        • Sundberg K.
        • et al.
        Quality assessment in prospective nuchal translucency screening for Down syndrome.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 18: 641-644
        • Fries N.
        • Althuser M.
        • Fontanges M.
        • et al.
        Quality control of an image-scoring method for nuchal translucency ultrasonography.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196 (e1–5): 272
        • Logghe H.
        • Cuckle H.
        • Sehmi I.
        Centre-specific ultrasound nuchal translucency medians needed for Down's syndrome screening.
        Prenat Diagn. 1995; 23: 389-392
        • Frey Tirri B.
        • Troeger C.
        • Holzgreve W.
        • et al.
        Quality management of nuchal translucency measurement in residents.
        Ultraschall Med. 2007; 28: 484-488
        • Evans M.I.
        • Van Decruyes H.
        • Nicolaides K.H.
        Nuchal translucency measurements for first-trimester screening: the ‘price’ of inaccuracy.
        Fetal Diagn Ther. 2007; 22: 401-404
        • Gyselaers W.J.
        • Vereecken A.J.
        • Van Herck E.J.
        • et al.
        Audit on nuchal translucency thickness measurements in Flanders, Belgium: a plea for methodological standardization.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 24: 511-515
        • Palomaki G.E.
        • Neveux L.M.
        • Donnenfeld A.
        • et al.
        Quality assessment of routine nuchal translucency measurements: a North American laboratory perspective.
        Genet Med. 2008; 10: 131-138
        • D'Alton M.E.
        • Cleary-Goldman J.
        • Lambert-Messerlian G.
        • et al.
        Maintaining quality assurance for sonographic nuchal translucency measurement: lessons from the FASTER Trial.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 33: 142-146
        • Koster M.P.
        • Wortelboer E.J.
        • Engels M.A.
        • et al.
        Quality of nuchal translucency measurements in The Netherlands: a quantitative analysis.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34: 136-141
        • Nicolaides K.H.
        • Snijders R.J.
        • Cuckle H.S.
        Correct estimation of parameters for ultrasound nuchal translucency screening.
        Prenat Diagn. 1998; 18: 519-523