Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 30, ISSUE 3, P519-531, September 2010

Preimplantation Genetic Testing: Indications and Controversies

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Handyside A.H.
        • Kontogianni E.H.
        • Hardy K.
        • et al.
        Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification.
        Nature. 1990; 344: 768-770
        • Goossens V.
        • Harton G.
        • Moutou C.
        • et al.
        ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection IX: cycles from January to December 2006 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2007.
        Humanit Rep. 2009; 24: 1786-1810
        • Dennis C.
        Genetics: deaf by design.
        Nature. 2004; 431: 894-896
        • Verlinsky Y.
        • Rechitsky S.
        • Schoolcraft W.
        • et al.
        Designer babies—are they a reality yet? Case report: simultaneous preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Fanconi anaemia and HLA typing for cord blood transplantation.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2000; 1: 31
        • Tajima H.
        • Sueoka K.
        • Moon S.Y.
        • et al.
        The development of novel quantification assay for mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy aimed at preimplantation genetic diagnosis of Leigh encephalopathy.
        J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007; 24: 227-232
        • Whittingham D.G.
        • Penketh R.
        Prenatal diagnosis in the human pre-implantation period. Meeting held at the Ciba Foundation on the 13th November 1986.
        Humanit Rep. 1987; 2: 267-270
        • Braude P.
        • Bolton V.
        • Moore S.
        Human gene expression first occurs between the four- and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development.
        Nature. 1988; 332: 459-461
        • Zegers-Hochschild F.
        • Adamson G.D.
        • de Mouzon J.
        • et al.
        International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009.
        Fertil Steril. 2009; 92: 1520-1524
        • Baruch S.
        • Kaufman D.
        • Hudson K.L.
        Genetic testing of embryos: practices and perspectives of US in vitro fertilization clinics.
        Fertil Steril. 2008; 89: 1053-1058
        • Strachan T.
        • Read A.
        Genes in pedigrees and populations. Human molecular genetics 3.
        3rd edition. Garland Science, New York2004 (102–11)
        • Spits C.
        • Sermon K.
        PGD for monogenic disorders: aspects of molecular biology.
        Prenat Diagn. 2009; 29: 50-56
        • Goossens V.
        • Harton G.
        • Moutou C.
        • et al.
        ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection VIII: cycles from January to December 2005 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2006.
        Humanit Rep. 2008; 23: 2629-2645
        • Fragouli E.
        Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: present and future.
        J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007; 24: 201-207
        • Verlinsky Y.
        • Rechitsky S.
        • Schoolcraft W.
        • et al.
        Preimplantation diagnosis for Fanconi anemia combined with HLA matching.
        JAMA. 2001; 285: 3130-3133
        • Yaron Y.G.V.
        • Gamzu R.
        • Malcov M.
        Genetic analysis of the embryo.
        in: Gardner D. Weissman A. Howles C. Textbook of assisted reproductive technologies. 3rd edition. Informa, London2009: 403-416
        • Amor D.J.
        • Cameron C.
        PGD gender selection for non-Mendelian disorders with unequal sex incidence.
        Humanit Rep. 2008; 23: 729-734
        • Yeargin-Allsopp M.
        • Rice C.
        • Karapurkar T.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of autism in a US metropolitan area.
        JAMA. 2003; 289: 49-55
        • Pennings G.
        Personal desires of patients and social obligations of geneticists: applying preimplantation genetic diagnosis for non-medical sex selection.
        Prenat Diagn. 2002; 22: 1123-1129
        • ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
        Genetic aspects of female reproduction.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2008; 14: 293-307
      1. Instability of the human genome: mutation and DNA repair.
        in: Strachan T. Read A. Human molecular genetics 3. 3rd edition. Garland Science, New York2004: 316-349
        • Anderson S.
        • Bankier A.T.
        • Barrell B.G.
        • et al.
        Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome.
        Nature. 1981; 290: 457-465
        • Poulton J.
        • Kennedy S.
        • Oakeshott P.
        • et al.
        Preventing transmission of maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA diseases.
        BMJ. 2009; 338: b94
        • Marchington D.R.
        • Macaulay V.
        • Hartshorne G.M.
        • et al.
        Evidence from human oocytes for a genetic bottleneck in an mtDNA disease.
        Am J Hum Genet. 1998; 63: 769-775
        • Cree L.M.
        • Samuels D.C.
        • de Sousa Lopes S.C.
        • et al.
        A reduction of mitochondrial DNA molecules during embryogenesis explains the rapid segregation of genotypes.
        Nat Genet. 2008; 40: 249-254
        • Tachibana M.
        • Sparman M.
        • Sritanaudomchai H.
        • et al.
        Mitochondrial gene replacement in primate offspring and embryonic stem cells.
        Nature. 2009; 461: 367-372
        • Steffann J.
        • Frydman N.
        • Gigarel N.
        • et al.
        Analysis of mtDNA variant segregation during early human embryonic development: a tool for successful NARP preimplantation diagnosis.
        J Med Genet. 2006; 43: 244-247
        • Bredenoord A.L.
        • Dondorp W.
        • Pennings G.
        • et al.
        PGD to reduce reproductive risk: the case of mitochondrial DNA disorders.
        Humanit Rep. 2008; 23: 2392-2401
        • Moustafa H.
        • Rizk B.
        • Nagy Z.
        Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for single-gene disorders.
        in: Rizk B. Garcia-Velasco J. Sallam H. Infertility and assisted reproduction. Cambridge University Press, New York2008: 657-676
        • Verlinsky Y.
        • Ginsberg N.
        • Lifchez A.
        • et al.
        Analysis of the first polar body: preconception genetic diagnosis.
        Humanit Rep. 1990; 5: 826-829
        • Verlinsky Y.
        • Cieslak J.
        • Ivakhnenko V.
        • et al.
        Preimplantation diagnosis of common aneuploidies by the first- and second-polar body FISH analysis.
        J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998; 15: 285-289
        • Kuliev A.
        • Verlinsky Y.
        Meiotic and mitotic nondisjunction: lessons from preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2004; 10: 401-407
        • Kuliev A.
        • Cieslak J.
        • Ilkevitch Y.
        • et al.
        Chromosomal abnormalities in a series of 6,733 human oocytes in preimplantation diagnosis for age-related aneuploidies.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2003; 6: 54-59
        • Strom C.M.
        • Verlinsky Y.
        • Milayeva S.
        • et al.
        Preconception genetic diagnosis of cystic fibrosis.
        Lancet. 1990; 336: 306-307
        • Strom C.M.
        • Ginsberg N.
        • Rechitsky S.
        • et al.
        Three births after preimplantation genetic diagnosis for cystic fibrosis with sequential first and second polar body analysis.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 178: 1298-1306
        • Goossens V.
        • De Rycke M.
        • De Vos A.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
        Humanit Rep. 2008; 23: 481-492
        • Van de Velde H.
        • De Vos A.
        • Sermon K.
        • et al.
        Embryo implantation after biopsy of one or two cells from cleavage-stage embryos with a view to preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
        Prenat Diagn. 2000; 20: 1030-1037
        • Michiels A.
        • Van Assche E.
        • Liebaers I.
        • et al.
        The analysis of one or two blastomeres for PGD using fluorescence in-situ hybridization.
        Humanit Rep. 2006; 21: 2396-2402
        • Tarin J.J.
        • Conaghan J.
        • Winston R.M.
        • et al.
        Human embryo biopsy on the 2nd day after insemination for preimplantation diagnosis: removal of a quarter of embryo retards cleavage.
        Fertil Steril. 1992; 58: 970-976
        • McArthur S.J.
        • Leigh D.
        • Marshall J.T.
        • et al.
        Blastocyst trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for familial monogenic disorders and chromosomal translocations.
        Prenat Diagn. 2008; 28: 434-442
        • Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technique
        • Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine
        Preimplantation genetic testing: a Practice Committee opinion.
        Fertil Steril. 2008; 90: S136
        • Rechitsky S.
        • Verlinsky O.
        • Amet T.
        • et al.
        Reliability of preimplantation diagnosis for single gene disorders.
        Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001; 183: S65-S68
        • Kearns W.G.
        • Pen R.
        • Graham J.
        • et al.
        Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening.
        Semin Reprod Med. 2005; 23: 336-347
        • Sermon K.
        • Van Steirteghem A.
        • Liebaers I.
        Preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
        Lancet. 2004; 363: 1633-1641
        • Hattori M.
        • Yoshioka K.
        • Sakaki Y.
        High-sensitive fluorescent DNA sequencing and its application for detection and mass-screening of point mutations.
        Electrophoresis. 1992; 13: 560-565
        • Wilton L.
        • Thornhill A.
        • Traeger-Synodinos J.
        • et al.
        The causes of misdiagnosis and adverse outcomes in PGD.
        Humanit Rep. 2009; 24: 1221-1228
        • Thornhill A.R.
        • deDie-Smulders C.E.
        • Geraedts J.P.
        • et al.
        ESHRE PGD Consortium ‘Best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)’.
        Humanit Rep. 2005; 20: 35-48
        • Renwick P.J.
        • Trussler J.
        • Ostad-Saffari E.
        • et al.
        Proof of principle and first cases using preimplantation genetic haplotyping—a paradigm shift for embryo diagnosis.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2006; 13: 110-119
        • Sherlock J.
        • Cirigliano V.
        • Petrou M.
        • et al.
        Assessment of diagnostic quantitative fluorescent multiplex polymerase chain reaction assays performed on single cells.
        Ann Hum Genet. 1998; 62: 9-23
        • Fiorentino F.
        • Magli M.C.
        • Podini D.
        • et al.
        The minisequencing method: an alternative strategy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of single gene disorders.
        Mol Hum Reprod. 2003; 9: 399-410
        • Zhang L.
        • Cui X.
        • Schmitt K.
        • et al.
        Whole genome amplification from a single cell: implications for genetic analysis.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992; 89: 5847-5851
        • Wilton L.
        Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and chromosome analysis of blastomeres using comparative genomic hybridization.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2005; 11: 33-41
        • Bejjani B.A.
        • Shaffer L.G.
        Application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization to clinical diagnostics.
        J Mol Diagn. 2006; 8: 528-533
        • Wells D.
        • Sherlock J.K.
        • Handyside A.H.
        • et al.
        Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridisation.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 1999; 27: 1214-1218
        • Hu D.G.
        • Webb G.
        • Hussey N.
        Aneuploidy detection in single cells using DNA array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
        Mol Hum Reprod. 2004; 10: 283-289
        • Le Caignec C.
        • Spits C.
        • Sermon K.
        • et al.
        Single-cell chromosomal imbalances detection by array CGH.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34: e68
        • Spits C.
        • Le Caignec C.
        • De Rycke M.
        • et al.
        Whole-genome multiple displacement amplification from single cells.
        Nat Protoc. 2006; 1: 1965-1970
        • Spits C.
        • Le Caignec C.
        • De Rycke M.
        • et al.
        Optimization and evaluation of single-cell whole-genome multiple displacement amplification.
        Hum Mutat. 2006; 27: 496-503
        • Ethical Issues in Genetic Testing
        ACOG Committee Opinion No. 410. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111: 1495-1502
        • Savulescu J.
        • Kahane G.
        The moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life.
        Bioethics. 2009; 23: 274-290
        • Aarden E.
        • Van Hoyweghen I.
        • Vos R.
        • et al.
        Providing preimplantation genetic diagnosis in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands and Germany: a comparative in-depth analysis of health-care access.
        Humanit Rep. 2009; 24: 1542-1547
        • Wertz D.C.
        • Fletcher J.C.
        • Nippert I.
        • et al.
        In focus. Has patient autonomy gone too far? Geneticists' views in 36 nations.
        Am J Bioeth. 2002; 2: W21
        • Lyerly A.D.
        • Steinhauser K.
        • Voils C.
        • et al.
        Fertility patients' views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey.
        Fertil Steril. 2010; 93: 499-509
        • Mastenbroek S.
        • Twisk M.
        • van Echten-Arends J.
        • et al.
        In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 9-17
        • Hardarson T.
        • Hanson C.
        • Lundin K.
        • et al.
        Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial.
        Humanit Rep. 2008; 23: 2806-2812
        • Meyer L.R.
        • Klipstein S.
        • Hazlett W.D.
        • et al.
        A prospective randomized controlled trial of preimplantation genetic screening in the “good prognosis” patient.
        Fertil Steril. 2009; 91: 1731-1738
        • Kuehn B.M.
        Prenatal genome testing sparks debate.
        JAMA. 2008; 300: 1637-1639
        • Steptoe P.C.
        • Edwards R.G.
        Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo.
        Lancet. 1978; 2: 366
        • Reddy U.M.
        • Wapner R.J.
        • Rebar R.W.
        • et al.
        Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109: 967-977
        • Simpson J.L.
        • Rebar R.W.
        • Carson S.A.
        Professional self-regulation for preimplantation genetic diagnosis: experience of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and other professional societies.
        Fertil Steril. 2006; 85: 1653-1660
        • Jones Jr., H.W.
        • Cohen J.
        IFFS surveillance 07.
        Fertil Steril. 2007; 87: S1-67
        • Spar D.
        Reproductive tourism and the regulatory map.
        N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 531-533
        • Jain T.
        • Harlow B.L.
        • Hornstein M.D.
        Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization.
        N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 661-666
        • Klimanskaya I.
        • Chung Y.
        • Becker S.
        • et al.
        Human embryonic stem cell lines derived from single blastomeres.
        Nature. 2006; 444: 481-485
        • Mateizel I.
        • De Temmerman N.
        • Ullmann U.
        • et al.
        Derivation of human embryonic stem cell lines from embryos obtained after IVF and after PGD for monogenic disorders.
        Humanit Rep. 2006; 21: 503-511
        • Crockin S.
        Adam Nash: legally speaking, a happy ending or slippery slope?.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2001; 2: 6-7