Review Article| Volume 27, ISSUE 2, P241-253, June 2007

Proposed Research Training Guidelines for Residents in Laboratory Medicine

      It is expected that the role of the clinical pathologist will evolve from the more passive role of managing testing facilities to one of active service provider, using powerful molecular, cell biologic, and biochemical tools. The scope of knowledge required to be an effective physician scientist or an accomplished practicing clinical pathologist, however, cannot be acquired through clinical training alone and requires dedicated, structured research learning time. The goal of this article is to consider mechanisms that effectively integrate research training and scholarly activity into residency education in laboratory medicine/clinical pathology. The proposed curricula are purposely unstructured to allow maximum flexibility for training programs to meet the needs and career goals of individual residents.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.


      Subscribe to Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Smith B.R.
        • Wells A.
        • Alexander C.B.
        • et al.
        Curriculum content and evaluation of resident competency in clinical pathology (laboratory medicine): a proposal.
        Hum Pathol. 2006; 37: 934-968
        • Plebani M.
        • Laposata M.
        Translational research involving new biomarkers of disease. A leading role for pathologists.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 2006; 126: 169-171
      1. AAMC's Task Force II. Promoting translational and clinical science: the critical role of medical schools and teaching hospitals. Available at: Accessed July 28, 2006.

        • Hamann K.L.
        • Fancher T.L.
        • Saint S.
        • et al.
        Clinical research during internal medicine residency: a practical guide.
        Am J Med. 2006; 119: 276-283
        • Gorstein F.
        • Weinstein R.S.
        Rethinking pathology residency training and education.
        Hum Pathol. 2001; 32: 1-3
        • Alexander C.B.
        Pathology graduate medical education (overview from 1926–2005).
        Hum Pathol. 2006; 37: 923-928
        • Holmboe E.S.
        • Rodak W.
        • Mills G.
        • et al.
        Outcomes-based evaluation in resident education: creating systems and structured portfolios.
        Am J Med. 2006; 119: 708-714
      2. Smith LH Jr. Training of physician/scientists. Their training and supply: volume III. Commissioned papers. Committee on Biomedical and Behavioral Research Personnel, Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel, National Research Council in collaboration with Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington, DC: 1989. p. 107–20.

      3. Jolly P. Charting outcomes in the match. National Resident Matching Program, and Association of American Medical Colleges; 2006.

        • Cooper T.
        Concluding remarks at a symposium entitled The academic physician: an endangered species, October 1980.
        in: Schwartz H.M. Gottheil D.L. The education of physician-scholars. Preparing for leadership in the health care system. Betz Publishing Co., Rockville (MD)1993