Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 25, ISSUE 4, P795-807, December 2005

Download started.

Ok

Intraoperative Imprint Cytology in Assessment of Sentinel Lymph Nodes and Lumpectomy Surgical Margins

  • Ardeshir Hakam
    Affiliations
    Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology and Pathology, Pathology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center Research Institute at the University of South Florida, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA

    Department of Pathology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ni Ni Khin
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Cytopathology Laboratory, Bayfront Medical Center, 701 Sixth Street, South St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA.
    Affiliations
    Department of Pathology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL

    Cytopathology Laboratory, Bayfront Medical Center, 701 Sixth Street, South St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA
    Search for articles by this author
      Sentinel lymph node (SN) mapping has recently become a standard of care in surgical treatment of certain malignancies such as breast cancer and malignant melanoma. This procedure has especially revolutionized the surgical treatment option for breast cancer patients by avoiding unnecessary complete axillary lymph node dissection (CLND) and its complications in patients who have negative SNs [
      • Albertini J.J.
      • Lyman G.H.
      • Cox C.E.
      • et al.
      Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer.
      ,
      • Giuliano A.E.
      • Kirgan D.M.
      • Guenther J.M.
      • et al.
      Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.
      ]. Intraoperative evaluation allows the patients who have positive SNs to undergo more cost-effective CLND during the same surgery [
      • Cox C.E.
      • Pendas S.
      • Cox J.M.
      • et al.
      Guidelines for sentinel node biopsy and lymphatic mapping of patients with breast cancer.
      ]; however, the accuracy of sensitive intraoperative detection of SN metastasis, particularly micrometastasis, has become a challenge among pathologists. Currently there is no standardized protocol for intraoperative evaluation. Determining the most appropriate manner for intraoperative evaluation of SN is the responsibility of the individual pathologist, and should be determined on a case-by-case basis. Some prefer frozen section, and others favor cytological evaluation using touch imprint or scrape preparations, with or without intraoperative, low-molecular–weight cytokeratin immunohistochemical stain (CK-IHC). Some prefer none, with deferral to permanent sections. The advantages of intraoperative imprint cytology (IIC) over frozen section include: it preserves the lymph node architecture, prevents loss of micrometastases, costs less, has faster turnaround time, and can sample multiple cut surfaces. The major disadvantage of both IIC and frozen section is that both techniques have rather low sensitivity in grossly negative SNs. Acknowledging the advantages and disadvantages of both frozen section and cytologic preparations, there is absolutely no intraoperative method with perfect sensitivity and specificity. The H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) in Tampa, Florida, was one of the first centers to introduce and use intraoperative imprint cytology (IIC) of the SN, and has been doing so since 1997 [
      • Ahmad N.
      • Ku N.N.
      • Nicosia S.V.
      • et al.
      Evaluation of sentinel lymph node imprints in breast cancer staging.
      ,

      Cox CE, Centeno B, Dickson D, et al. Accuracy of intraoperative cytology for sentinel lymph node evaluation in the treatment of breast carcinoma. Cancer 2005;105(1):13–20.

      ]. In this section, the authors emphasize techniques and results related to IIC of SN based on an institutional protocol.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Albertini J.J.
        • Lyman G.H.
        • Cox C.E.
        • et al.
        Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer.
        JAMA. 1996; 276: 1818-1822
        • Giuliano A.E.
        • Kirgan D.M.
        • Guenther J.M.
        • et al.
        Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.
        Ann Surg. 1994; 220: 391-401
        • Cox C.E.
        • Pendas S.
        • Cox J.M.
        • et al.
        Guidelines for sentinel node biopsy and lymphatic mapping of patients with breast cancer.
        Ann Surg. 1998; 227: 645-651
        • Ahmad N.
        • Ku N.N.
        • Nicosia S.V.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of sentinel lymph node imprints in breast cancer staging.
        Acta Cytol. 1998; 42: 1218
      1. Cox CE, Centeno B, Dickson D, et al. Accuracy of intraoperative cytology for sentinel lymph node evaluation in the treatment of breast carcinoma. Cancer 2005;105(1):13–20.

        • Litz C.E.
        • Beitsch P.D.
        • Roberts C.A.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative cytologic diagnosis of breast sentinel lymph nodes in the routine, nonacademic setting; a highly specific test with limited sensitivity.
        Breast J. 2004; 10: 383-391
        • Baitchev G.
        • Gortchev G.
        • Todorova A.
        Intraoperative sentinel lymph node examination by imprint cytology during breast surgery.
        Curr Med Res Opin. 2002; 18: 185-187
        • Bochner M.A.
        • Farshid G.
        • Dodd T.J.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative imprint cytologic assessment of the sentinel node for early breast cancer.
        World J Surg. 2003; 27: 430-432
        • Creager A.J.
        • Geisinger K.R.
        • Shiver S.A.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes for metastatic breast carcinoma by imprint cytology.
        Mod Pathol. 2002; 15: 1140-1147
        • Cserni G.
        Intraoperative sentinel lymph node examination by imprint cytology and frozen sectioning during breast surgery.
        Br J Surg. 2000; 87: 1596
        • Henry-Tillman R.S.
        • Korourian S.
        • Rubio I.T.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative touch preparation for sentinel lymph node biopsy; a 4-year experience.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2002; 9: 333-339
        • Lee A.
        • Krishnamurthy S.
        • Sahin A.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative touch imprint of sentinel lymph nodes in breast carcinoma patients.
        Cancer. 2002; 96: 225-231
        • Llatjos M.
        • Castella E.
        • Fraile M.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative assessment of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast carcinoma: accuracy of rapid imprint cytology compared with definitive histologic workup.
        Cancer. 2002; 96: 150-156
        • Ratanawichitrasinnn A.
        • Biscotti C.V.
        • Levy L.
        • et al.
        Touch imprint cytologic analysis of sentinel lymph nodes for detecting axillary metastases in patients with breast cancer.
        Br J Surg. 1999; 86: 1346-1348
        • Rubio I.T.
        • Korourian S.
        • Cowan C.
        • et al.
        Use of touch preps for intraoperative diagnosis of sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 1998; 5: 689-694
        • Van Diest P.J.
        • Torrenga H.
        • Borgstein P.J.
        • et al.
        Reliability of intraoperative frozen section and imprint cytological investigation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.
        Histopathology. 1999; 35: 14-18
        • Turner R.R.
        • Hansen N.M.
        • Stern S.L.
        • Giuliano A.E.
        Intraoperative examination of the sentinel lymph node for breast carcinoma staging.
        Am J Pathol. 1999; 112: 627-634
        • Motomura K.
        • Inaji H.
        • Komoike Y.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative sentinel lymph node examination by imprint cytology and frozen sectioning during breast surgery.
        Br J Surg. 2000; 87: 597-601
        • Ku N.N.
        Pathologic examination of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer.
        Sur Onc Clin N Am. 1999; 8: 469-479
        • Aihara T.
        • Munakata S.
        • Morino H.
        • et al.
        Touch imprint cytology and immunohistochemistry for the assessment of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003; 29: 845-848
        • Bussolati G.
        • Gugliotta P.
        • Morra I.
        • et al.
        The immunohistochemical detection of lymph node metastases from infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast.
        Br J Cancer. 1986; 54: 631-636
        • Weinberg E.S.
        • Dickson D.
        • White L.
        • et al.
        Cytokeratin staining for intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma.
        Am J Surg. 2004; 188: 419-422
        • Anscher M.S.
        • Jones P.
        • Prosnitz L.R.
        • et al.
        Local failure and margin status in early stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy.
        Ann Surg. 1993; 218: 22-28
        • Schnitt S.J.
        • Abner A.
        • Gelman R.
        • et al.
        The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy.
        Cancer. 1994; 74: 1746-1751
        • Smitt M.C.
        • Nowels K.W.
        • Zbedlick M.J.
        • et al.
        The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long term results of breast conservation.
        Cancer. 1995; 76: 259-267
        • Schnitt S.J.
        • Connolly J.L.
        Processing and evaluation of breast excision specimens. A clinically oriented approach.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 1992; 98: 125-137
        • Gal R.
        Scrape cytology assessment of margins of lumpectomy specimens in breast cancer.
        Acta Cytol. 1992; 36: 838-839
        • Shidham V.
        • Gupta L.M.
        • Haber M.
        • et al.
        intraoperative scrape cytology: comparison with frozen sections, using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve.
        Diagn Cytopathol. 2000; 23: 134-139
        • Ku N.N.K.
        • Cox C.E.
        • Reintgen D.S.
        • et al.
        Cytology of lumpectomy specimens.
        Acta Cytol. 1991; 35: 417-421
        • Klimberg V.S.
        • Westbrook K.C.
        • Korourian S.R.
        Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 1998; 5: 220-226
        • Cox C.E.
        • Pendas S.
        • Ku N.N.
        • et al.
        Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins.
        Am Surg. 1998; 64: 1-6
        • Weinberg E.
        • Cox C.E.
        • Dupont E.
        • et al.
        Local recurrence in lumpectomy patients after imprint cytology margin evaluation.
        Am J Surg. 2004; 188: 349-354
        • Fowble B.
        The significance of resection margin status in patients with early-stage invasive cancer treated with breast-conservation therapy.
        Breast J. 1998; 4: 126-131
        • Fisher B.
        • Redmond C.
        • Poisson I.T.
        • et al.
        Eight year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 1989; 320: 822-828
        • Fisher B.
        • Anderson S.
        • Bryant J.
        • et al.
        Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1270-1271
        • Creager A.J.
        • Shaw J.A.
        • Young P.R.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative evaluation of lumpectomy margins by imprint cytology with histologic correlation. A community hospital experience.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002; 126: 846-848
        • Pinotti J.A.
        • Carvalho F.M.
        Intraoperative pathological monitorization of surgical margins: a method to reduce recurrences after conservative treatment for breast cancer.
        Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2002; 23: 11-16
        • Douglas-Jones A.G.
        • Logan J.
        • Morgan J.M.
        • et al.
        Effect of margins of excision on a recurrence after local excision of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
        J Cin Pathol. 2002; 55: 581-586
        • Cox C.E.
        • Hyacinthe M.
        • Gonzalez R.J.
        • et al.
        Cytologic evaluation of lumpectomy margins in parients with ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical outcome.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 1997; 4: 644-649