Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 24, ISSUE 4, P1023-1035, December 2004

The laboratory is a key partner in assuring patient safety

      For a long time the general public has had the perception that health care in the United States is efficient, effective, of high quality, and, most importantly, safe. It has recently been publicized that, regarding patient safety, this may not always be the case. Data have been generated that confirm the already emerging perception that medical errors occur more frequently than was previously suspected. However, the actual impact of medical errors on patient morbidity and mortality surprised everyone and initiated a thorough review of the health care processes to correct this problem. Improvement of patient safety is now a priority in all areas of health care, including the clinical laboratory.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Committee on Quality of Health Care in America
        Institute of Medicine.
        in: Kohn L.T. Corrigan J.M. Donaldson M.S. To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academy Press, Washington, DC2000 (Available at:)
        • Committee on Quality of Health Care in America
        Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.
        in: National Academy Press, Washington, DC2001 (Available at:)
        • Committee on the National Quality Report on Health Care Delivery
        Institute of Medicine.
        in: Corrigan J.M. Hurtado M.P. Swift E.K. Envisioning the national health care quality report. National Academy Press, Washington, DC2001 (Available at:)
        • Committee on Enhancing Federal Quality Healthcare Programs
        Corrigan J.M. Eden J. Smith B.M. Leadership by example: coordinating government roles in improving health care quality. National Academy Press, Washington, DC2002 (Available at:)
        • Committee on Identifying Areas for Quality Improvement
        Institute of Medicine, Board on Health Care Services.
        in: Adams K. Corrigan J.M. Priority areas for national action: transforming health care quality. National Academy Press, Washington, DC2003 (Available at:)
      1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National health care quality report (2003). Prepublication copy. Available at: http://www.qualitytools.ahrq.gov/qualityreport/download_report.aspx. Accessed September 29, 2004.

        • Stahl M.
        • Lund E.D.
        • Brandslund I.
        Reasons for a laboratory's inability to report results for requested analytical tests.
        Clin Chem. 1998; 44: 2195-2197
        • Lapworth R.
        • Teal T.K.
        Laboratory blunders revisited.
        Ann Clin Biochem. 1994; 31: 78-84
        • Baele P.L.
        • De Bruyere M.
        • Deneys V.
        • Dupont E.
        • Flament J.
        • Lambermont M.
        • et al.
        Bedside transfusion errors. a prospective study by the Belgium SAnGUIS Group.
        Vox Sang. 1994; 66: 117-121
        • McClelland D.B.
        • Phillips P.
        Errors in blood transfusion in Britain: survey of hospital hematology departments.
        BMJ. 1994; 308: 1205-1206
        • Shulman I.A.
        • Lohr K.
        • Derdiarian A.K.
        • Picukaric J.M.
        Monitoring transfusionist practices: a strategy for improving transfusion safety.
        Transfusion. 1994; 34: 11-15
        • Williamson L.M.
        • Lowe S.
        • Love E.M.
        • Cohen H.
        • Soldan K.
        • McClelland D.B.
        • et al.
        Serious hazards of transfusion (SHOT) initiative: analysis of the first two annual reports.
        BMJ. 1999; 319: 16-19
        • Bonini P.
        • Plebani M.
        • Ceriotti F.
        • Rubboli F.
        Errors in laboratory medicine.
        Clin Chem. 2002; 48: 691-698
        • Ross J.W.
        • Boone D.J.
        Assessing the effect of mistakes in the total testing process on the quality of patient care.
        ([abstract])in: Martin L. Addison B. Wagner W. Essien J. 1989 Institute on Critical Issues in Health Laboratory Practice. DuPont Press, Wilmington (DE)1989: 173
        • Nutting P.A.
        • Main D.S.
        • Fischer P.M.
        • Stull T.M.
        • Pontious M.
        • Seifert M.
        • et al.
        Towards optimal laboratory use. Problems in laboratory testing in primary care.
        JAMA. 1996; 275: 635-639
        • AuBuchon J.P.
        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        • Busch M.P.
        Safety of the blood supply in the United States: opportunities and controversies.
        Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127: 904-909
        • Busch M.P.
        • Kleinman S.H.
        • Nemo G.J.
        Current and emerging infectious risks of blood transfusions.
        JAMA. 2003; 289: 959-962
      2. Conti N, Hardy G. Reducing laboratory specimen error with handheld technology. Presented at the Second Annual Summit on Patient Safety and Information Technology. Orlando, Florida, July 10–11, 2003.

        • NCCLS
        Procedures for the handling and processing of blood specimens; approved guideline—second edition.
        NCCLS, Wayne (PA)1999 (Document H18–A2)
        • Howanitz P.J.
        • Renner S.W.
        • Walsh M.K.
        Continuous monitoring over 2 years decreases identification errors: a College of American Pathologists Q-TRACKS study.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002; 126: 808-815
        • Stankovic A.K.
        • Smith S.
        Elevated serum potassium values: the role of preanalytic variables.
        Pathol Patterns Reviews. 2004; 121 (in press)