Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 22, ISSUE 1, P279-297, March 2002

Download started.

Ok

Peripheral blood film review: the demise of the eyecount leukocyte differential

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bentley SA
        • Johnson A
        • Bishop C
        A parallel evaluation of four automated hematology analyzers.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 1993; 100: 626-632
        • Bull BS
        • Korpman RA
        The logistics of the leukocyte differential count (implications for automation).
        in: Koepke JA Differential Leukocyte Counting. CAP Conference/Aspen 1977. College of American Pathologists, Skokie, IL1978: 217-224
      1. CAP TODAY. May, 1994;
        • Cella Vision
        Leaflet of Diffmaster Octiva. Cella Vision AB, Lund, Sweden2001
        • Cox CJ
        • Habermann TM
        • Payne BA
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the Coulter Counter Model S-Plus IV.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 1985; 84: 297-306
        • Dutcher TF
        • Jakubowski D
        • Orser B
        A comparative evaluation of automated blood cell differential analyzers: Hematrak, Larc and Hemalog D.
        in: Koepke JA Differential Leukocyte Counting. CAP Conference/Aspen 1977. College of American Pathologists, Skokie, IL1978: 161-176
        • Kobayashi T
        Cell analyzer, Microx.
        Medical Electronics and Biotechnology. 1979; 17: 64
      2. Koepke JA Differential leukocyte counting CAP Conference, Aspen, 1978 College of American Pathologists, Skokie, IL1977
        • Koepke JA
        • Dotson MA
        • Shifman MA
        False positive/false negative rates for the eyecount leukocyte differential count.
        Blood Cells Mol Dis. 1985; 11: 173-186
        • Mitsuhashi T
        • Kwai Y
        • Arai T
        • et al.
        Telehematology trials using the Sysmex blood cell imaging filing system.
        Sysmex J International. 2000; 5: 77-84
        • NCCLS Document H20-A
        Reference Leukocyte Differential Count (Proportional) and Evaluation of Instrument Methods. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, PA1992
        • Pierre RV
        The Technicon Hemalog D Automated Leukocyte Differential System.
        in: Koepke JA Differential Leukocyte Counting. CAP Conference/Aspen 1977. College of American Pathologists, Skokie, IL1978: 145-160
        • Pierre RV
        • O'Sullivan MB
        Evaluation of the Hemalog D automated differential leukocyte counter.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 1974; 49: 870-874
        • Rümke CL
        The statistically expected variability in differential counting.
        in: Koepke JA Differential Leukocyte Counting. CAP Conference/Aspen, 1977. College of American Pathologists, Skokie, IL1978: 39-45
        • Stiene-Martin EA
        Causes for poor leukocyte distribution in manual spreader-slide blood films.
        Am J Med Tech. 1980; 46: 624-632
        • Trobaugh Jr, FE
        • Bacus JW
        Design and performance of the LARC Automated Leukocyte Classifier.
        in: Koepke JA Differential Leukocyte Counting. CAP Conference/Aspen 1977. College of American Pathologists, Skokie, IL1978: 119-134