<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/?rss=yes"><title>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine</title><description>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine RSS feed: Current Issue. 
 
 Clinics in Laboratory Medicine   updates you on the latest trends in clinical laboratory management; keeps you up to date 
on the newest advances; and provides a sound basis for creating and working in a highly effective clinical laboratory. Each issue focuses 
on a single topic in pathology and is presented under the direction of a reputed guest editor associated with a major clinical laboratory 
and academia.</description><link>http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>0272-2712</prism:issn><prism:volume>29</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:publicationDate>December 2009</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209001061/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209001073/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000687/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000651/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000675/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000626/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS027227120900064X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000614/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000596/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000638/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000602/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000663/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209001085/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209001061/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Contents</title><link>http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209001061/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Contents</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0272-2712(09)00106-1</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 29, 4 (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>29</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0272-2712(09)X0005-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>v</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>viii</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209001073/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Forthcoming issues</title><link>http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209001073/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Forthcoming issues</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0272-2712(09)00107-3</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 29, 4 (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>29</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0272-2712(09)X0005-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>ix</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>ix</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000687/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Preface</title><link>http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000687/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>   Respiratory viruses continue to be a fascinating subject. The mutability of these viruses leads to the periodic emergence of new serotypes or species of viruses as human pathogens. Because these viruses are readily transmitted, a new respiratory virus that emerges can spread rapidly. The coronavirus associated with the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the novel influenza A (H1N1) virus (swine influenza) are two examples of respiratory viruses that spread very quickly after emerging. According to data from the World Health Organization, there have been 55,867 cases and 238 deaths due to the H1N1 virus to date (http://www.who.int/csr/don/2009_06_24/en/index.html, accessed June 25, 2009). This outbreak underscores the importance of our continued attention to the epidemiology, manifestations, and diagnosis of respiratory viruses.</description><dc:title>Preface</dc:title><dc:creator>Alexander J. McAdam</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.cll.2009.07.012</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 29, 4 (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>29</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0272-2712(09)X0005-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>xi</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>xii</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000651/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Developments in Tissue Culture Detection of Respiratory Viruses</title><link>http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000651/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Viral culture is the historical gold standard for detection of most viruses that cause respiratory tract infections. Viral culture remains valuable because it is reasonably sensitive for most respiratory viruses, and it is cheaper and less technically demanding than nucleic acid amplified tests. The disadvantages of conventional viral culture using multiple tubes of cell lines are that it is labor intensive, moderately expensive, and slow. Advances in viral culture include the introduction of new cell lines, which can be more sensitive or convenient than previously used cell lines, and the use of shell-vial culture for respiratory viruses. Shell-vial culture is as sensitive as conventional culture for most respiratory viruses and it has a much shorter turn-around time. The shorter turn-around time increases the clinical utility of these cultures.</description><dc:title>Developments in Tissue Culture Detection of Respiratory Viruses</dc:title><dc:creator>Alexander J. McAdam, Ann Marie Riley</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.cll.2009.07.009</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 29, 4 (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>29</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0272-2712(09)X0005-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>623</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>634</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000675/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Developments in Immunologic Assays for Respiratory Viruses</title><link>http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000675/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>In most hospitals, clinics, and doctor's offices, immunologic assays are the only tests performed on site for the diagnosis of respiratory viruses. More than other methods, immunoassays have been shown to affect patient management and save costs, aiding early administration of antiviral therapy, reduction in unnecessary tests and antibiotics, and earlier discharges. This article discusses the major immunologic methods employed for respiratory virus diagnosis, recent developments in immunoassays and sample collection, and current test algorithms.</description><dc:title>Developments in Immunologic Assays for Respiratory Viruses</dc:title><dc:creator>Marie Louise Landry</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.cll.2009.07.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 29, 4 (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>29</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0272-2712(09)X0005-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>635</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>647</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000626/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Antigen-Based Assays for the Identification of Influenza Virus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus: Why and How to Use Them in Pediatric Practice</title><link>http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000626/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>This article describes the clinical and socioeconomic relevance of influenza (IV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in pediatrics, the characteristics and limitations of currently available assays, and the impact of rapid diagnostic tests. This article shows that rapid tests for the detection and identification of IV and RSV in the respiratory secretions of infants and children are useful in the diagnosis of common, and possibly severe diseases, such as influenza and bronchiolitis. The tests' specificity and sensitivity make them most reliable when the prevalence of influenza or RSV infection is high, which suggests that their routine use should be restricted to the peak periods of viral circulation. The most recently marketed tests are similarly effective in identifying viruses, and so pediatricians should choose those that are less expensive, less time consuming, and easier to perform and to interpret.</description><dc:title>Antigen-Based Assays for the Identification of Influenza Virus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus: Why and How to Use Them in Pediatric Practice</dc:title><dc:creator>Nicola Principi, Susanna Esposito</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.cll.2009.07.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 29, 4 (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>29</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0272-2712(09)X0005-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>649</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>660</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS027227120900064X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Utilization of Nucleic Acid Amplification Assays for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses</title><link>http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS027227120900064X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Viruses are major contributors to morbidity and mortality from acute respiratory infections in all age groups worldwide. Accurate identification of the etiologic agent of respiratory tract infections is important for proper patient management. Diagnosis can be problematic, because a range of potential pathogens can cause similar clinical symptoms. Nucleic acid amplification testing is emerging as the preferred method of diagnostic testing. Real-time technology and the ability to perform multiplex testing have facilitated this emergence. Commercial platforms for nucleic acid amplification testing of respiratory viruses include real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), nucleic acid sequence-based amplification, and loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Multiplex PCR with fluidic microarrays or DNA chips are the most recent diagnostic advance. These assays offer significant advantages in sensitivity over antigen detection methods and in most cases also over traditional culture methods. A limited number of assays, however, are commercially available, thus laboratory developed assays frequently are used. This article reviews the performance of commercially available assays and discusses issues relevant to the development of in-house assays.</description><dc:title>Utilization of Nucleic Acid Amplification Assays for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses</dc:title><dc:creator>Sue C. Kehl, Swati Kumar</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.cll.2009.07.008</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 29, 4 (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>29</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0272-2712(09)X0005-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>661</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>671</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000614/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Emerging Molecular Assays for Detection and Characterization of Respiratory Viruses</title><link>http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000614/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>This article describes several emerging molecular assays that have potential applications in the diagnosis and monitoring of respiratory viral infections. These techniques include direct nucleic acid detection by quantum dots, loop-mediated isothermal amplification, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, amplification using arbitrary primers, target-enriched multiplexing amplification, pyrosequencing, padlock probes, solid and suspension microarrays, and mass spectrometry. Several of these systems already are commercially available to provide multiplex amplification and high-throughput detection and identification of a panel of respiratory viral pathogens. Further validation and implementation of such emerging molecular assays in routine clinical virology services will enhance the rapid diagnosis of respiratory viral infections and improve patient care.</description><dc:title>Emerging Molecular Assays for Detection and Characterization of Respiratory Viruses</dc:title><dc:creator>Wenjuan Wu, Yi-Wei Tang</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.cll.2009.07.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 29, 4 (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>29</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0272-2712(09)X0005-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>673</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>693</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000596/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Human Bocaviruses: A Review and Discussion of Their Role in Infection</title><link>http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000596/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Respiratory tract infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The human bocavirus (HBoV) is a newly recognized human parvovirus first reported in 2005. Since its discovery, this virus has been associated with upper and lower respiratory tract disease and gastroenteritis worldwide. This article is a comprehensive review of what is known about HBoV. It includes an evaluation of diagnostic modalities, symptoms occurring in affected patients, and a discussion as to whether HBoV is responsible for identified clinical manifestations. The article reviews the incidence and effect of coinfection and updates on related members (HBoV-2 and HBoV-3) recently reported. Understanding of respiratory viruses such as HBoV remains vitally important to the health of adult and pediatric patients.</description><dc:title>The Human Bocaviruses: A Review and Discussion of Their Role in Infection</dc:title><dc:creator>Brian D.W. Chow, Frank P. Esper</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.cll.2009.07.010</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 29, 4 (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>29</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0272-2712(09)X0005-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>695</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>713</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000638/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Recently Discovered Human Coronaviruses</title><link>http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000638/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>In marked contrast to their historical classification as relatively harmless, common cold-causing, respiratory pathogens, human coronaviruses (HCoVs) are associated with more severe clinical complications, as emphasized by the discovery of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated CoV (SARS-CoV) in 2003. Still, their precise pathogenic potential is largely unknown, particularly regarding the most recently identified strains HCoV-NL63 and HCoV-HKU1, and definite proof for their etiology remains a major challenge. This article focuses on the characteristics of the five HCoVs that are known, and summarizes current knowledge of their pathogenic potential in people, with an emphasis on the interactions between these viruses and their cognate receptors on susceptible target cells.</description><dc:title>Recently Discovered Human Coronaviruses</dc:title><dc:creator>Brigitte A. Wevers, Lia van der Hoek</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.cll.2009.07.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 29, 4 (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>29</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0272-2712(09)X0005-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>715</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>724</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000602/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine Development</title><link>http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000602/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a clinically significant cause of respiratory tract disease, especially among high-risk infants and immunocompromised and elderly adults. Despite the burden of disease, there is no licensed prophylactic RSV vaccine. The initial efforts to develop an RSV vaccine involved formalin-inactivated virus preparations that unexpectedly caused vaccine-enhanced disease in clinical trials in RSV-naive children. Over the last 40 years, cautious and deliberate progress has been made toward RSV vaccine development using various experimental approaches, including live attenuated strains and vector-based and viral protein subunit/DNA-based candidates. The scientific rationale, preclinical testing, and clinical development of each of these approaches are reviewed.</description><dc:title>Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine Development</dc:title><dc:creator>Yoshihiko Murata</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.cll.2009.07.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 29, 4 (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>29</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0272-2712(09)X0005-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>725</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>739</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000663/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Respiratory Viruses in Bronchiolitis and Their Link to Recurrent Wheezing and Asthma</title><link>http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209000663/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Bronchiolitis is the leading cause of hospitalization for children younger than 1 year of age and these hospitalized children have an increased risk for developing childhood asthma. It remains unclear, however, which children who have severe bronchiolitis (eg, an episode requiring hospitalization) will develop recurrent wheezing or asthma. Although many environmental and genetic factors may play a role in the pathway from bronchiolitis to asthma, this article focuses on the viruses that have been linked to bronchiolitis and how these viruses may predict or contribute to future wheezing and asthma. The article also discusses vitamin D as an emerging risk factor for respiratory infections and wheezing.</description><dc:title>Respiratory Viruses in Bronchiolitis and Their Link to Recurrent Wheezing and Asthma</dc:title><dc:creator>Jonathan M. Mansbach, Carlos A. Camargo</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.cll.2009.07.011</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 29, 4 (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>29</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0272-2712(09)X0005-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>741</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>755</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209001085/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Index</title><link>http://www.labmed.theclinics.com/article/PIIS0272271209001085/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Index</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0272-2712(09)00108-5</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 29, 4 (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-12-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinics in Laboratory Medicine</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>29</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0272-2712(09)X0005-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>757</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>765</prism:endingPage></item></rdf:RDF>